Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.
~ Thomas Jefferson

Monday, April 30, 2012

Will Your Vote Be Counted?


For those of you who have read my posts wherein I state that I believe Obama has worked out the means to force his own re-election in November, no matter how the citizens of this country vote, read this article from Ron Paul's web site, "Daily Paul". In it, the person posting writes that the Obama administration is outsourcing the counting of votes for more than half the states in the Union, via a Spanish company that has connections to George Soros.

I don't know if this is the same method Ahmadinejad in Iran used to claim himself the winner of their elections or not, but it certainly supports the "open mike" comment that Obama was overheard making to Russia's President Medvedev, where he told him that he could be "more flexible after I am re-elected."

Not "if", but "when".

This would explain his confidence, his willingness to behave in ways that the majority of Americans don't like - such as forcing the passage of the Affordable Patient Care Act, which a significant majority of citizens do not want; like restricting the production of oil and natural gas in this country instead of encouraging it; like attempting to intimidate the Supreme Court in their decision concerning the Constitutionality of the Affordable Patient Care Act.

It would be hard to believe that a sufficient number of Americans would overlook the damage to our economy, the high number of people out of work (not simply the make-believe number of how many people are technically unemployed, according to the government's manipulated statistics), and such in order to vote for this fool. Nonetheless, I am convinced he will be re-elected, by hook or by crook (as in Chicago politicians, deceased voters, and undocumented aliens) in November.

As Kerodin , Pete at WRSA, and others have stated before, we won't be voting our way out of this mess. Unless we vote from the rooftops. Molon Labe.

If this article is accurate, and there certainly is reason to suspect it may be, as the facts are verifiable, then our votes will not count. Votes will be "counted", sure, but they may not be the votes we cast. And Obama will give himself the mandate he needs to re-shape America to suit his agenda of turning us into another failed socialist state.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Saudi Grand Mufti approves of sex with a dead spouse for muslims

I have written a number of times on my belief that islam is not a religion, it is a death cult and a sham religion created by an Arab pedophile in order to justify his desire to rule those around him and to be able to have sex with children without suffering any consequences. Recently, the Saudi Grand Mufti has decreed that a ten-year-old girl may be married, saying that a well-brought up child would be equipped to handle all marital duties. "Our mothers and grandmothers got married when they were barely 12. Good upbringing makes a girl ready to perform all marital duties at that age."

In Egypt, "Egypt's new Islamist-dominated parliament is preparing to introduce a controversial law that would allow husbands to have sex with their deceased wives up to six hours after death.

Known as the 'Farewell Intercourse' law, the measure is being championed as part of a raft of reforms introduced by the parliament that will also see the minimum age of marriage lowered to 14 for girls." (ANI)

Ann Barnhardt, known for her video - which "went viral" - where she denounces islam by quoting actual Sura in the Quran which expose islam for the death cult that it is (burning each page that the quotes were taken from), speaks to further evidence of the vileness of this fake religion as shown in this attempt by the islamists in Egypt to pass a law allowing necrophilia. Her article, Necrophilia Is Not A Joke, explains her stand on this horrifying display of the sickness inherent in the practice of islam.

While you are trying to digest this information, consider the possible corollaries: as the Unified Code of Military Justice has recently removed all punishments previously provided for sodomy and bestiality, due both to the end of DADT and the acceptance of muslims into the military, perhaps now necrophilia will become permissible as well, at least for muslims in the Armed Services. Perhaps the military will have to accept the presence of 10 year old girls as the spouses of muslim servicemen in the Armed Forces.

Additionally, wherever muslims live, could we begin to see the killing of even more muslim wives, wives killed simply because they refused sex with their husbands, who decided a six-hour window of "pleasure" was worth the lack of response available from a recently deceased wife?

These are not idle considerations, but realistic possibilities based on the pronouncements of imams and muslim legislators.

Do you still think it is possible to co-exist with muslims?

Do you understand this is orthodox islam we are talking about, not some "extremist" version?
Do you still believe this made-up "religion" needs to be accepted and allowed to be practiced in America?
I certainly don't.





Fast and Furious Film Production - Please Help




Mike McNulty, the producer of "Waco - Rules of Engagement", is looking to produce a film on the debacle run by BATF (the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms) called "Fast and Furious". For those few of you who come here that may not know what Operation Fast and Furious was, please visit the web site of David Codrea called "A Journalist's Guide to Project Gunwalker", wherein he and Mike Vanderboegh broke open the story of how the BATF coerced a number of private gun stores into selling over 2000 semi-automatic weapons - so-called "assault rifles", including a number of .50 caliber sniper rifles - to criminal buyers who then transported them into Mexico where they were given to their real purchasers, the drug cartels. Their facts and information were provided by direct testimony from BATF agents who were ordered by their superiors to allow the guns to be "walked" into Mexico, even though they knew people would be killed with those weapons.

The story finally came to light when a Border Patrol agent was killed with one of the weapons that was allowed to be taken into Mexico at the insistence of BATF supervisors in charge of this program. Brian Terry was gunned down, and the ATF - with pressure from the FBI - allowed the criminal cartel members to return to Mexico, because one of them was a "highly-placed" informant for the FBI. The FBI insisted that he be allowed to remain in place, in spite of the fact that he murdered a Federal law enforcement agent. Several BATF agents who were upset by this operation finally came forward when "one of their own" died because of guns they were ordered to allow to be walked into Mexico. [I won't speak to the fact that they only came forward when another Federal agent was killed, not when hundreds of innocent Mexican citizens - not competing cartel members - were killed with these weapons.]

Eric Holder, the Attorney general - who has stated, and made plain, that he will only prosecute when crime is white-on-black - denied any knowledge of this operation, but was caught lying when emails were discovered that indicated he had prior knowledge. The BATF supervisors involved in this were promoted and moved around within the agency in order to protect them and to keep them from testifying to what their involvement was in this criminal enterprise. The White House was proven to be involved as well, via emails to and from Obama's staff, although Obama continues to pretend he had no knowledge of the situation. Holder has stone-walled, refused to respond to subpoenas from Congress, redacted almost ever word from the few documents he has provided, and generally thumbed his nose at Congressman Darrel Issa and Senator Chuck Grassley, the two Republicans who have been making a half-hearted attempt to take BATF, DOJ, Holder and those others involved to task for this atrocious violation of domestic and international law (BATF and DOJ, as well as the State Department, never advised the government of Mexico that they were running an operation that affected their country, as well as providing guns to Mexican drug cartels. It is possible that Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State, was read into this operation and had direct knowledge as well).

It should be well noted that BATF's excuse for running this operation was to "track" guns going to the drug cartels, supposedly for the purpose of arrests and prosecutions. This was obviously a lie, for several reasons. Once the guns were picked up by the "strawman" purchasers, the agents were refused permission to arrest the buyers. They were also refused permission to track these buyers back to the cartels. Insane, right? Contrary to what BATF claimed they were trying to accomplish, right?

The only way this operation makes sense is if you consider the real reason it was done: to raise the statistics on the number of deaths that could be attributed to firearms that were bought at gun stores in the United States which "found their way" into Mexico, so that BATF, DOJ, and the Brady Bunch could claim that American weapons sold through American gun stores were causing the deaths of Mexican citizens. So that when the Mexican government ran the serial numbers on crime guns found at the scene of murders in Mexico, they would come back to guns sold in the U.S.

Can you conceive of the depth of immorality and criminality of U.S. agencies banking on the deaths of citizens of another country simply so they could vilify American gun stores and try to further restrict the sale of firearms in our own country? That members of our own government could approve of allowing hundreds, perhaps thousands, of deaths in order to clamp down harder on our Second Amendment? Is this not treason, "high crimes and misdemeanors", committed against the citizens of another country and our own country simply to advance the socialist agenda of damaging the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens? It is an almost unspeakable crime to so completely devalue the very lives of hundreds of human beings just to attack our rights to sell and buy firearms. But, as we saw with the Left in Stalin's Russia and Mao's China, the deaths of even millions is "just a statistic", completely acceptable in order to advance the Marxist agenda.

So, back to Mike McNulty and his film, "Blood On Their Hands". Very little mention of this has been publicized by the mainstream media. CBS did a few segments, until their reporter Sharyl Attkisson was shut down by CBS after they received pressure from DOJ. Fox News did a few segments as well, but they dropped the ball too (Fox is lambasted by the Left as being a Republican mouthpiece, a "far right" slanted organization, but they have more lying liberals on their staff than they do real conservatives, and they did not follow up on this story). Consequently, McNulty wants to produce a film that tells the truth about "Fast and Furious". He needs funding to do this, and has engaged the web site "Kickstarter" in an attempt to develop the necessary funding.

Kickstarter collects the funds via on-line donations, but will return any and all donations if the amount required in total is not reached within the allotted time period. So your donation is safe, and will not be held unless it is actually used to fund the film. This is about as honest and as safe as it gets, folks. Please donate, even just a couple of bucks if that is all you can afford. It would be good to have this film produced, if only to provide a visual record of this horrendous debacle. If you donate at least $20, as I have, you will receive a copy of the film when it has been produced.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Who's Your Daddy?


Ah, it's good to be back to the old Blogger interface. Took me a while to realize there was a way to recover it.

I came across an article by Jerome Corsi at WND (World Net Daily) concerning who he believes the real, biological father of Barack Hussein Obama is, in fact. That would be his mentor Frank Marshall Davis, black member of the US Communist Party, radical, and (radical) poet.

Going strictly by the photo, I think there is good reason to believe Davis and our arrogant, petulant, and deceitful President share the same genes. Chin shape, facial creases, hairline are all quite similar, much more so than with Barack Obama, Sr.

Corsi goes on to give biographical data that support such a notion, as well. While sufficient evidence isn't provided in the article, it sounds as if it may be present in the film to which this article refers. Davis' presence in Hawaii at the same time as Stanley Ann Dunham is telling, as well, along with the known fact - admitted by our little Barry Soetero, aka Barack Obama II - that he spent some time under Davis' wing. Or perhaps even closer than that, as it has been said that Davis was "fond" of children.

It would also explain much more cogently why Obama is so enamored of Communist, socialist ideology, and a hatred for America and American "exceptionalism". Why little Barry feels the need to tear down our country in an attempt to render us no better than any other failed State in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, or Asia. Why he is willing to dupe the black community into thinking he has their best interests at heart, when he is actually simply using them in an attempt to divide America into (at least) two camps, two groups at each other's throat. Why he is so desirous of destroying the Constitution and rendering it powerless to protect us as it was meant to when it was written and ratified.

If you Google "Bill Ayers" for books written by him, "Dreams from My Father" shows up in the list. Based on the few writings that are proven to have been written by Obama, the spelling, grammar, and syntax of that book are at odds with Obama's literary abilities, or lack of ability, to be more accurate. So it is understandable that the "help" he admitted getting from Bill Ayers was probably more substantial than a bit of advice. The book was most likely actually written by Ayers, just as Google indicates.

Read the article. Corsi gives a reasonable and logical basis for believing that Davis was more than just a friend to Obama. It would certainly explain a lot. Such as the very first Executive Order written by Barack Hussein Obama, wherein he sealed all documents which would provide any transparency at all concerning his birth, his schooling, his nationality, and his true identity. In spite of the fact that claiming Davis as his other biological parent would clear up the "native born" American question relating to his eligibility to be President, the fact - if it is such - that his father was a registered member of the Communist Party might not sit so well with the voters.

No matter what the answer is, America really screwed the pooch electing this sick bastard. And I mean that biologically, as well as describing his aberrant personality.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

If I Wanted America to Fail, aka Dreams from My Fathers

I just watched a powerful video, thanks to a post from TL Davis at TL in Exile. It - in my opinion - is exactly what Barack Hussein Obama wants. The dream he developed at the feet of his "fathers", his mentors: Lolo Soetero, Frank Marshall Davis, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, and George Soros. His heros: V.I.Lenin, Josef Stalin, Mao Tse Tung (Mao Zedong). The dream that he shares with Michelle Obama, who also hates America, except for what she can grab in the way of fame, fortune, and expensive vacations.

This video is so true to our times, to what is being done to us and this country in the name of "government", "the environment", "Anthropomorphic Global Warming" (AGW - now "Climate Change", since all the lies about warming have been proven false and fraudulent), "social equality", "wealth distribution", the  "needs" (greed and sloth-driven desires) of the "99%" and the OWS crowds, and the propaganda that the "filthy rich who aren't paying their fair share of taxes" (and they aren't talking about Obama's cronies at Goldman Sachs, The Federal Reserve, Lehman Brothers, Jon Corzine, Tim Geithner, etc.)

It doesn't mention the race war that Obama, Holder, Sharpton and Jackson have been trying to foment, but it doesn't need to do so. It speaks directly to how our country is deliberately being sabotaged.

Please watch this. It isn't long, but it is very important.

(Sorry. This horrible new version of blogger won't allow me to embed the video.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-4gnNz0vc&feature=player_embedded

Friday, April 20, 2012

Bank of America supports Obama, not America


This is a bit of a departure for me, but I want to pass on the information I just picked up from PJ Media. Evidently, Bank of America is dropping McMillan Group International as a customer - a customer of over twelve years - because they have become too involved with firearms.

(http://pjmedia.com/blog/breaking-bank-of-america-reportedly-drops-gun-company-for-political-reasons/?singlepage=true)


It doesn't matter that they have been supplying our military with rifles and other tools to enable them to function better and keep each other safer when in combat. It doesn't matter that McMillan's rifles have been saving lives in combat for some years now, in the form of the M40 sniper rifle (taking out muslim snipers in the Middle East, as well as towel heads preparing to fire RPGs, emplacing IEDs, sitting in ambush, etc.). Bank of America has decided to make a political statement - once again, as they have done this before - attempting to damage a company which makes a significant contribution to getting our boys back home safely.

But that's not all. They also support little Barry Homobama by processing campaign contributions - many from illegal foreign sources and illegal domestic sources, as Barry has shut off the filters that would keep those donations from being processed. And B of A is permitting this to happen.

"Bank of America was the recipient of well over 100 billion dollars in federal money. They are also one of just two vendors processing payments for Barack Obama’s 2012 presidential campaign, employing a system that disables safeguards against illegal foreign donations. Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, North Carolina, is the site of the Democratic Nation Convention in September." [For "federal money" substitute "with YOUR tax dollars".]

 And the NRA is playing patty-cake with B of A, claiming that there is no issue here:

"In a conversation with Douglas K. Bland, a BoA Senior Vice President, NRA-ILA was assured that there was no such anti-gun policy.

Mr. Bland provided NRA-ILA with a written statement of their policy, which states "Bank of America does not have a corporate-wide policy to deny banking services solely on the applicant's involvement in the firearms industry." [Notice they don't say it isn't a policy. They say there is no "corporate-wide" policy. But that's good enough for the ol' NRA.]

NRA-ILA is pleased with this statement, but will continue to monitor business activities to ensure that gun owners and gun related business receive fair treatment.  If you have had issues with Bank of America, please contact NRA-ILA so additional follow-up can be done.  If needed, Mr. Bland has indicated his desire to assist with claims of unfair denial of services for firearms related reasons."

As usual, the NRA pretends to protect gun owners and the gun industry, while accepting excuses that are easily proven false. Just as they do from RINOs and Democrats - like Max Baucus in Montana, who pretends to be pro-Second Amendment. Another fail, NRA. PJ Media goes on to note:

"This is at least the third time Bank of America has implemented a discriminatory policy against gun manufacturers. In early 2001, a scandal erupted over the bank’s attempt to discriminate against another Arizona-based company (Arizona Response Systems). The resulting public outrage forced a reversal of the policy."

So. Any of you folks reading this who do business with B of A and want to make a small but real difference, cut up your cards and mail them back in one of their pre-paid envelopes you get with your monthly statement. Include your own statement of why you are doing this. Between their support for Obama's campaign, including processing illegal contributions, and their attempt to damage businesses they do not approve of, they deserve to experience some pain. Even if you don't bank with them, write them anyway. They need to understand that the government won't be able to bail them out on our nickel forever. They certainly don't deserve to be permitted to call themselves the Bank of America.


http://pjmedia.com/blog/breaking-bank-of-america-reportedly-drops-gun-company-for-political-reasons/?singlepage=true

Monday, April 16, 2012

Why carrying a knife can be as useful as carrying a gun


Kerodin at IIIpercent to Bonnie Gadsden to Straight Forward in a Crooked World, a chain of posts that takes you to the article "Dark Arts for Good Guys: the Right to Knife" Part 1 and Part 2. Direct and real, even ugly in places, but excellent information that could save your life.

The only life or death confrontations I have experienced have been while on duty as a peace officer, and involved guns, and few of those, thankfully. But I carry a knife everywhere, all of the time. A good strong folder that can be used defensively, like my Emerson CQC-7B Wave. I had envisioned the possibility of using it as a stand-off deterrent, to ward off someone trying to grapple with me (remember, I am not trained in the use of a knife, so perhaps that isn't a good idea, though it sounded good). I imagined I could use it to fight someone else also armed with a knife, but feared getting fatally cut myself in the process, so I had hoped to be able to respond with my carry firearm instead in such a case.

The author at Straight Forward explained that a knife could be useful in broader circumstances, and that it could be possible to win without getting cut to ribbons. His descriptions of possible techniques and modes of attack are sometimes on the gruesome side for someone who has not stopped to really imagine what it would be like to stab or cut another person, but again, as I have posted elsewhere recently, we are talking about responding to someone trying to kill you, or someone you love.

This two-part article is something you should read if you are serious about winning against someone when armed only with a knife. Even if you have no plans to practice or train with a knife, alone or with a partner, just reading these articles may provide you with knowledge that will come back to you and save your butt should you find yourself in a fight for your life and only have a blade of some kind with which to work.