The German People Really Were Guilty

Thank you, thank you, Pete at WRSA, for posting a link to powerofnarrative.blogspot, called Once Upon a Time. In it, the author of the blog writes about a book, Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany, which describes and documents excellent reasons to believe that the German people were well aware of the death and destruction rained upon the Jews, the Poles, the Gypsies, and others who died at the hands of the Third Reich.

There are those in the Liberty movement, the Patriot movement, who probably are fairly decent and well-meaning individuals, but people with whom I will have no truck. Why? Because they are apologists for the German people, for the horrific abuses and murders of over six million human beings, simply because the Germans pursued Communists with a vengeance.

Yes, the Marxists have been responsible for much of the sorry state of our country today, for the move toward fascism that our country has taken since FDR, and appears ready to consummate with this Administration. Certainly, the Soviets and the Chinese killed many times more of their own citizens as the Nazis. Does that excuse the German people, or should they be forgiven because they fought the Commies (after initially siding with them before Hitler decided it would be more fun to stab them in the back?) No chance in Hell.

In a description of the book at Amazon:

Extensively documented, highly readable and illustrated with never-before-published photographs, Backing Hitler convincingly debunks the myth that Nazi atrocities were carried out in secret. From the rise of the Third Reich well into the final, desperate months of the war, the destruction of innocent lives was inextricably linked to the will of the German people.

The operative phrase being, "the will of the German people."

Further:

Debate still rages over how much ordinary Germans knew about the concentration camps and the Gestapo's activities during Hitler's reign. Now, in this well-documented and provocative volume, historian Robert Gellately argues that the majority of German citizens had quite a clear picture of the extent of Nazi atrocities, and continued to support the Reich to the bitter end.

The author of the post goes on to relate the book to our current situation, with Obama's "kill list" and the host of other fascist Changes he has made to our country (I use to list these as "socialist", until Thomas Sowell corrected my thinking on the difference). So, we as a society are no better than the German people were during the rise to power of Hitler and his attempt to establish a Third Reich. Our government has become so corrupt and overbearing that we might as well call Barack "Adolph", and far too many American citizens think such government is acceptable.

Yes, there were scattered individuals in Germany who did what they could, such as Herr Schindler, just as there are people in this country who recognize the horror of our government running amok. But there were far too few in Nazi Germany. The average German citizen was proud of what Hitler and his cronies did, had no problem whatsoever with the removal of those "filthy Jews" from "polite" society.

In his post at Once Upon a Time, the author mentions the possibility of Arabs, muslims, being persecuted and rounded up as terrorists. He needs to be corrected on that notion, as we have seen - especially in places like Dearborn, MI, where muslims threw rocks and bottles at some men who were silently holding signs critical of Islam while police stood by and did nothing - that muslims will continue to be held blameless and allowed all manner of criminality in the service of political correctness. Instead, the terrorists will be you and me, people who speak out against the State, people who try to be honest and forthright. We are the ones who will be rounded up, not the muslims.

And if you truly believe it will never happen, ask one of the few people of Japanese history who lived through the detention of all Japanese Americans - recent immigrants and natural born American citizens of Japanese descent - how they liked being forced to live in a concentration camp, right here in America. Ask the few people who survived the FBI assault with tanks and helicopters on the men, women, and children of Mt. Carmel in Waco, Texas.

Then ask this grandmother how much she enjoyed the stun grenades thrown through her living room window, simply because the police suspected that someone in her house might have been responsible for saying some bad things about their police department.

Does it not fill you with rage, or at least terrify you, that our law enforcement personnel are willing to act entirely outside of the rule of law? Does it not move you want to reply in kind when you realize that these lawless scum with badges will never suffer any consequences stronger than a little bad press - and only from alternative media, never MSM? It should.

So, let it be said that we here in America are indeed guilty of not raising hell when this behavior occurs. Although I'll be damned if I can figure out what we could have done. Some think we could have voted our way out of it, forced the bad politicians out of office. When has that ever worked before? How many Presidents have been impeached? Two. How many have been convicted? Zero. (Yes, Nixon resigned before he was impeached, but he probably would not have been convicted either.) The political system is rigged to protect its own, especially when it comes to the Executive Office.

I'd like to think there are more of us who speak out against the current political atrocities than ever spoke out in Germany during the thirties and forties against the actual, physical atrocities of Jews being beaten, burned out of their homes, killed or sent to concentration camps.. Unfortunately, I think we will be just as unsuccessful at creating any groundswell of indignation as were those few decent Germans.

Follow The Ideology

I caught Bill Whittle's video called, "Follow the Ideology" (instead of "follow the money") on Kevin's "The Smallest Minority" blog a few minutes ago. It concerns Obama's use of executive privilege to seal documents connected with the Fast and Furious program of which he and Eric Holder are obviously a part, or perhaps even the prime movers.

Please, please view it. If you have the time, listen to the podcast the David Kopel that is listed also, but do NOT miss Bill Whittle's short video. The photos above are of murdered innocent Mexican citizens who were killed by Mexican cartel members, supposedly with some of the weapons provided by Holder's Fast and Furious scam.

All Too True redux

Just saw this on another web site, the Scottcarp Dream, and knew it was a perfect addendum to my previous post.

If you have a moment, and want to be completely scandalized as well as motivated to immediately remove your children from public (government) school, read his post on a book being used to teach children in the Toronto, Canada school system. It is being used to teach them that gender is not fixed, and that cross-dressing is perfectly acceptable.

All too true

While all of us who have followed the "Fast and Furious" debacle through the blogosphere realize it is merely tragic opera, black comedy, a lot of noise that will signify nothing in the end, this cartoon I ran across at The Smallest Minority portrays Obama's hyprocrisy perfectly. The man - and I say that loosely - is a total scumbag, a waste of good oxygen. Someday I will tell you what I really think of this walking shit-stain.

All because he and his Presidential leg-humping attack dog, Holder, thought they could use the murder of some Mexican nationals to justify further gun control in America. I'd say that they both deserve to share a cell with the nastiest rapist in the filthiest Mexican prison, but those two would probably enjoy it.

[Editorial addition: Speaking of putting Holder in prison, read this post from Free North Carolina, where he reposts an article from Godfather Politics.]

A Dire Warning

Thanks to Pete at WRSA, I have read an article by a blogger, Anthony Martin, who writes of his feelings that a dire event is likely to occur in the not-too-distant future. He speaks of his intuition, which he says is often correct, and goes on at length concerning his reasons for this. I have to chuckle a bit - not at his writing, which is eloquent and informed, but simply because he is as verbose as I tend to be. That being said, I cannot chuckle at his warning, because I agree with it one hundred percent, and for the very same reasons he gives.

I have stated before that we may well face a manufactured event, a false flag incident perhaps, that will be used as an excuse by Obama to either postpone elections, possibly along with the imposition of martial law to suppress any response by citizens who refuse to accept such an occurrence, or he may simply declare himself the winner of any elections that are held, just as Ahmadinejad did in Iran when he was "elected" President of that country. You only have to consider the numerous times he has side-stepped Congress and the Constitutional limits placed upon the powers of the Executive Office to understand the danger. Such as his recent "executive order" providing an amnesty that was defeated in Congress when it was offered as the "Dream Act". He is a deviant man, an arrogant man, who refuses to be thwarted in any way. I believe he will refuse to be thwarted when it comes to who is President next January.

Mr. Martin writes well and explains his thought process and reasoning better than I can. Please use the link to read his article. Yes, it is lengthy, but it is worth reading in full. If the link does not work for any reason, go to:

http://thelibertysphere.blogspot.com/2012/06/musings-after-midnight-dire-warning.html

Photographic Evidence-at the White House LGBT party

I have posted before, on a number of occasions, my belief that the Pretender-in-Chief is gay, or at least bi-sexual, although my guess is that his marriage is a sham, a marriage of political convenience. Let's face it: the country was obviously ready for its first black President, but its first gay, black President? I think not. I'm quite certain that the political machine of Soros/Saudi Arabia/the Chicago Boys knew damn well that that would never fly.

Yes, the country - which the Left and the flatulent mouthpieces of the administration (like Axelrod) claim is racist, any time someone disagrees with them - did indeed vote for a black President in large numbers. I won't go so far as to say he was actually elected by them, because of the massive voter fraud perpetrated by ACORN, the machinery of the Left, and the Democratic Party (but I repeat myself).

Now, I am one of those nefarious "Birthers", a person who suspects there is a very good reason that Obama has sealed all records of his birth, childhood, schooling and college activity (no, the "Record of Live Birth" is not only not a legal birth certificate, it has been proven beyond a doubt to have been a manipulated and false document). That reason is because it would not bear any scrutiny. That it would prove him to have been ineligible to run for the office of the President, let alone be elected.

However, that is not the point of this post (that was only inserted to get the Lefties to go into overload and stroke out, if they read this at all ;-) The point is that we have as our first black President another first along with that: our first gay President. The reason I say gay, rather than bi-sexual, is because based on his behavior I sincerely believe a check of the DNA of both of Michelle's daughters would prove that he was not their biological father.

Of course, I am prepared to be proven wrong on this assertion. He might have bit the bullet, so to speak, and A) provided some sperm for Michelle to be artificially inseminated with, or B) actually gritted his teeth and inserted his tiny member between those massive thighs.

Considering the size of those thighs, and the probable deficit in length of his junk, I would vote for AI, if he is biologically involved at all. And don't even think to suggest he might have used a different position. Michelle obviously suffers from steatopygia, so that would be a non-starter even if he were equipped like Long John Holmes (the porn star).

Finally, we know that Obama, or at least little Barry Soetero, spent some "quality time" with Frank Marshall Davis, who is believed to have had "short eyes" (pedophilia). As young as Barry was at that time, I'm quite certain the mulatto factor would have been attractive to Davis. Even if, as I have stated before, Davis was indeed Barry's biological father, we all know that it is not that uncommon for some fathers to molest their own children. Consider, further, that Davis was a racist and a Communist (literally a member of the CPA), he may not have felt that producing offspring from sex with a white upper-class woman was anything for which he needed to claim responsibility.

I can understand looking at Obama on a girl's bike and thinking "Dork!" rather than "Faggot!". But, how can you possibly look at that feminine simper on his face at the White House celebration of LGBT Day and not shout "Faggot!" Apologies to my gay friends, but as with most cultures, gays speak derogatorily of each other, just as blacks call each other "nigga". So, allow me to borrow a word from gay culture that certainly applies to a simpering fool who is obviously enjoying touching another very gay man. From the look on Homobama's face, he wanted everyone in attendance to know that he was enjoying it.

Closing the Trap

This morning I began re-reading Garet Garrett's brilliant treatise, "The Revolution Was". In it he describes how FDR, along with those "fellow travelers", those fellow Marxists who shared his vision, his agenda, launched functioning Communism in this country. How he and his ilk brought real Marxism into being within the workings of government and in the day-to-day existence of American society.

Garrett explained that those who were warning that it was going to happen were deluded, that it had already taken place while the country slept, or at least did not notice. He spoke of the fact that the meaning of words used to describe the free market, government, the intricacies of American society, had morphed. How the Left - the Communists, the Marxists of his day - had intentional changed the meaning of words that were in continuing use, but which meant something far different from what they had before.

Do we not see this happening today? When the Left speaks of the failure of capitalism, when it speaks of the favoritism and corruption of capitalism and the free market, but is actually speaking of the crony capitalism practiced by those in power, and especially by Obama and his cronies. When the left speaks of racism, but actually means any speech or actions it does not approve of that has taken place? When it speaks of unemployment, but is actually speaking of those people who are actively enrolled in state-operated unemployment programs, ignoring all those who have given up searching for work, or who are under-employed to the point of losing their homes, with children going hungry?

Obama and those who run the little homo puppet are simply attempting to close the trap. They have grown government by an order of magnitude over even the worst that both Bushes were capable of, members of CFR and the elitists that they are. What many people haven't yet figured out is that the Bush administrations wanted to accomplish the growth of control over the country incrementally, while Obama and those who pull his arrogant, egotistical strings can no longer wait, are unwilling to be patient. They want it now.

Consequently, they are employing - as I and many others have already mentioned - the Cloward-Piven strategy, where destruction of the economy will lead to dependence of the majority of the population upon the largess of government. If permitting the total loss of every bit of liberty, of sovereignty, is what it takes to feed and shelter a man and his family, he is likely to accept his role as slave.

Garrett wrote:

"The scientific study of revolution included, of course, analysis of opportunity. First and always, the

master of revolutionary technique is an opportunist. He must know opportunity when he sees it in the

becoming; he must know how to stalk it, how to let it ripen, how to adapt his means to the realities.

The basic ingredients of opportunity are few; nearly always it is how they are mixed that matters. But

the one indispensable ingredient is economic distress, and, if there is enough of that, the mixture will

take care of itself." (Emphasis mine.)

So, we have a combination we see happening before our very eyes, spoken of by Obama and his useful tools such as Rahm Emanuel ("You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.") We have the intentional destruction of the economy by Obama and his masters together with the verbally admitted use of opportunity - "serious crisis", in the words of Emanuel. Can anyone reading this post deny that this country is currently experiencing economic distress?

This country has been living a mild, not yet fully realized form of Marxism - a species of socialism - since FDR at the very least. To those in the Liberty movement who rant about how it is the fault of the "Boomers" that we are in such a mess, I say, "Please get your heads out of your nether cheeks, and understand it happened long before the Boomers were even a gleam in their daddy's eyes." We - the Boomers, along with those few of the Greatest Generation still alive - didn't make it any better, but neither did we make it worse. It is the natural progression of the agenda conceived not long after Marx and Lenin codified Communism, and the elite of our country, TPTB, the brokers, kingmakers, the members of CFR began to institute it here in this country.

Read all of Garrett that you can find. He was a brilliant, perceptive man, and his rational and cogent explanation of what had already taken place back during the reign of FDR will convince all but those unwilling to hear the truth. It will be time well spent, even if somewhat depressing. It is information you need, however, if you are going to understand the dimensions of what we face and what we must fight if we are ever to recover Liberty, in our time or in the future.