U.S. soldiers ordered to ignore Afghan allies’ abuse of boys

As I have stated numerous times in the past, the abuse, the sodomizing rapes of young boys, is a major facet of islam. mohammed intentionally included various forms of sexual deviation in his death cult "religion" in order to justify his own disgusting urges, but also to attract as many followers as possible. As has been the case for as long as islam has existed, "Women are for children, boys are for pleasure."

Our men in uniform are being forced to look the other way while our muslim "allies" in Afghanistan and elsewhere bring dogs onto U.S. bases to torture and otherwise abuse. They torture and kill the dogs for sport, and since islam tells them that dogs are "unclean", they feel justified in doing so. But, far worse, they are forced to look the other way and not intervene when they hear the screams of young boys being raped - on U.S. military bases - by the very "allies" they are working with to "win the hearts and minds" of the locals.

Even when the people of the villages where these boys are kidnapped from (and then held, chained to the muslim "allies'" beds on those U.S. bases they share with our troops), beg the U.S. military to save, to rescue, those children, the commanding officers force our men to ignore it, refuse to allow them to intervene. When one or more of them do intervene, they are court-marshaled, forced to resign (if they are officers), or otherwise harassed.

I'll say it again, for the cheap seats: there are no socially redeeming features of islam. It is a vicious, disgusting, morally depraved death cult that panders to the basest urges of the worst sub-human creatures to walk the face of this earth.

Read the whole article - and the comments - here:  http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/09/u-s-soldiers-ordered-to-ignore-afghan-allies-abuse-of-boys

By the way, bacha bazi - "boy play" with bacha bereesh - "beardless boys" -  is supposedly not permitted under shariah, but that is a lie. It is acceptable because it was acceptable to mohammed, the "prophet" (p*ss be onto him), who was/is considered "perfect, without fault". Anything mohammed did is consequently deemed correct and acceptable behavior.

This Zebra Deserves To Have His Time-Line Shortened, Considerably.

I try not to pull my punches here understanding that, even though very few people read this blog, if the wrong person reads it and dimes me out, I could suffer a very unpleasant visit from the SS. The Secret Service, that is. I have mentioned the Zebra's obvious faggotry, the African genetics that caused the extremely, grossly large ass on the creature he pretends to be married to, and many other reasons to wish ill of the worst CIC this nation has ever suffered under, including Lincoln, FDR, and Carter.

Tonight, visiting the site called Bare Naked Islam, a blog on my favorites list, but one which I have neglected lately until reminded tonight by a friend, I read a post that leaves me so enraged I would like to say some truly unwise things about what I would be very happy to see befall the muslim-loving Zebra. No, I am not saying he is a muslim. That would be ridiculous. He is far too narcissistic to submit to allah (the make-believe moon-god), or to follow the dictates of the qur'an. But I'm sure he has very fond memories of "submitting" - probably to an imam or two, along with their male friends and relatives - when he was a muslim in Indonesia, the adopted son of Mr. Soetero, the muslim husband of that diseased ex-white female canine who was his mother. I feel quite certain little Barry Soetero was indoctrinated into the pleasures a bacha bereesh ("beardless boy") could experience at the hands of the male muslims who prefer boys over women for sex (probably 85-90% of all muslim males, since women both terrify and disgust them, except when they can't find a nine-year-old (or an infant) to rape. It seems obvious to me that they prefer little girls and boys because they are too young and inexperienced to compare muslim males to men who are actually capable of enjoyable sex. And if a child should question why that particular organ is so small and ill-formed (and ill-utilized), they can beat the child severely. For a worthless, POS muslim male, what's not to like?

This ass-hat, scum-sucking destroyer of America (transforming her into a third-world country where the government controls every aspect of our lives, and strips the fruit of our hard labor from us to give to muslims in Gaza and elsewhere, or to his friends, bankers, and bundlers like Jon Corzine, the folks at Solyndra, SEIU, and elsewhere, has written Executive Orders arranging for amnesty, incredible social benefits that even most Americans are unable to enjoy, and a free pass across the border for many thousands of Mexicans, Guatemalans, Hondurans, and riff-raff from other countries south of our border and around the world. It is a known, and published, fact that many non-Hispanic illegals cross at both of our borders, including muslims from the Middle East and Africa. He also imports tens of thousands of Somalis at a time, and has stated he will bring as many as 200,000 Syrian "refugees" here to settle in our country.

Yet, here are twenty-seven - not even a significant fraction of the millions of illegal aliens who have already been allowed, encouraged, and assisted across our borders by our own government - Chaldean Christians who fled Iraq for their very lives, who will certainly be enslaved and/or killed if they return, who have been detained for entering our country without documents (undocumented aliens) and twelve have been ordered deported by an Immigration judge in California. The tradition of providing asylum for foreign nationals who are at risk of death if they were to be returned to their country is a very old and (previous to this bottom-dweller of a "Leader of the Free World") honored tradition. muslims are allowed into this country without any threat whatsoever to their lives simply because they are muslims. I've read that one or more of the Zebra's own family members from Kenya have stayed in this country years beyond the expiration of their visas.

I am having difficulties expressing the depth of my contempt for this cretin. He can order the Border Patrol to ignore and not detain illegal aliens coming across our southern border by the thousands, yet will allow Christian undocumented people - including some children - to be forced to return to a country where they will die, most likely at the hands of ISIS, which has killed thousands of Christians already, and enslaved many women and young girls as sex slaves. The Immigration judge who ordered this return should be singled out for some special attention as well as the rump-ranger in the Casa de Blanco.

Here is the article:

MUSLIM PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES decides to deport 12 Iraqi Chaldean Christians seeking asylum here after they fled the Islamic State (ISIS)

At the same time, Barack Hussein Obama is trying to bring in up to 200,000 Syrian Muslim so-called ‘refugees,’ but apparently has decided there is no room in America for 12 Chaldean Christians who are being persecuted and slaughtered in Iraq by ISIS. What’s more, Chaldean leaders in the US were advised by the attorneys representing the Christian ‘detainees’ NOT TO COMMENT on their deportation. Or what?

WND  Nearly half of the 27 Iraqi Christians the Obama administration has been holding for the past six months at an ICE detention center in Otay Mesa, California, are set to be deported in coming weeks, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said Monday.

An immigration judge ordered their removal in the last two weeks, ICE spokeswoman Lauren Mack said. She declined to provide specific information about why the immigrants are being deported and where they will be taken. If the Christians are sent back to Iraq they will face almost certain death.

The 27 Iraqi Christians — also known as Chaldeans — have been detained in Otay for about six months as their immigration cases proceeded, activists and family members told the San Diego Union-Tribune. The Chaldeans were detained by immigration authorities after they attempted to cross the U.S.-Mexico border through the San Ysidro Port of Entry without documentation several months ago.

Iraq is home to one of the most ancient Christian communities, evangelized by the Apostle Thomas not long after the time of Jesus. It was home to 1.5 million Christians under Saddam Hussein but after the U.S. invaded in 2003, al-Qaida started bombing churches and kidnapping prominent Christian leaders. The attacks became more fierce after al-Qaeda in Iraq morphed into ISIS and the country has been virtually emptied of its Christian population since then.

Thousands of Chaldeans have fled Iraq, escaping fierce persecution at the hands of terrorists fighting for the Islamic State. Many of their men who refuse to convert to Islam have been beheaded or otherwise killed while their wives and daughters have been sold into sex slavery. Tens of thousands have been forced out of their homes and live in hiding, afraid to even show up at United Nations’ refugee camps, where they often find themselves the victims of further abuse by Muslims.

The pending deportation of these 12 detainees comes as two Iraqi women were arrested on suspicion of fraudulently seeking asylum in the U.S., a federal crime that comes with a penalty of up to five years in custody and a $250,000 fine, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office. 

Iraqi Chaldean Christians rally in support of 27 Chaldeans being held at an ICE detention center in California.

At the same time the Obama administration deporting Christians, it has over the years allowed in countless Muslim migrants from Africa and the Middle East who crossed the Southern border the same way the Chaldeans did.

The U.S. has large Chaldean Catholic communities in Detroit and San Diego. Chaldean families have held regular demonstrations in support of the 27 detainees, the majority of whom have family who are U.S. citizens, but on Monday they were told by government officials they’d better not comment on the issue.

Obama’s Justice Department has also gone after the nation’s most successful Chaldean Christian immigration attorney, Robert Dekelaita, 52, of Glenview, Illinois.

DeKelaita has helped thousands of Christians escape the jihadist-inspired violence of Iraq, Egypt and Syria going back to 2001. For his efforts, he was indicted last year on charges of immigration fraud. DeKelaita maintains his innocence and is still awaiting trial.

In an interview with WND last month, DeKelaita said Chaldean-Americans are some of the hardest working of all immigrants. Many in Detroit are successful businessmen who employ hundreds in the convenience store and hospitality industries. (Obama only wants muslims from the Middle East who spend their lives on welfare)

RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:

obama-wont-release-27-iraqi-christian-asylum-seekers-held-in-detention-here-for-6-months-while-continuing-to-flood-u-s-cities-with-unscreened-muslims-from-syria-and-somalia

By BareNakedIslam • Posted in Persecution of Christians

As I was saying . . .

Watch the video, then read how ISIS is indeed the perfect expression of islam, from one who is still there, suffering from it.

[I made the mistake of writing this before I was able to watch this lady's video (I'm having problems accessing youtube), and ass-u-med she was going to describe her rape as a newly "married" nine-year-old muslim girl. Instead, she describes becoming "pissed-off" - her words - about the indoctrination she was getting in a group setting, explaining what she would face now that she was deemed an adult woman, per islam.] The video actually relates the indoctrination of nine-year-old girls - at least the ones who haven't already been married off and raped - that islam deems it not only acceptable, but desirable, for these little girls to be given to older men as sexual toys (under the example of mohammed, who was "perfect" in everything he did) and states that the father of a child given in "marriage" to a muslim male will go to "heaven" for allowing his child to be raped in this fashion. Of course, in islam, females merely exist to satisfy the urges of their muslim husbands, fathers, uncles, brothers, male friends and neighbors. mohammed (p*ss be onto him) created his "religion" with so many ways for his followers to enjoy the rape and abuse of females, and female children, because he knew that large numbers of scum-sucking arab/iranian males would flock to his banner to enjoy those perversions.

BTW, muslim boys are deemed adults at sixteen, so they can be enjoyed sexually up until that age, although I'm certain many imams and other influential muslims may stretch that a bit (pun intended).

 http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/the-unknown-the-end-of-my-childhood-at-the-age-of-9-in-iran

Then read the article:

JIHAD WATCH

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad

theology and ideology play in the modern

global conflicts

Iraqi priest: “There’s

no such thing as

moderate Islam…

ISIS represents

Islam one hundred

percent” AUGUST 27, 2015 4:15 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER

39 COMMENTS

Fr. Douglas al-Bazi’s coreligionists in the West, and their leaders

among the U.S. Catholic bishops, would be supremely

embarrassed if they heard him talking this way. They are sure that

Islam is a Religion of Peace, and woe to you if you don’t fall in line

behind them. They don’t want to hear about Islamic supremacism

or about Muslim persecution of Christians. Instead, they bow and

scrape before imams and Muslim leaders who have never lifted a

finger to stop Muslim persecution of Christians. They actively work

to silence and marginalize those who speak out about this

persecution. They consign today’s new martyrs to their fate,

sacrificing them on the altar of their fruitless, delusional and selfdefeating

quest for “dialogue” with Muslims. How many Christians

has that “dialogue” prevented from being persecuted or martyred?

Why, absolutely none, of course. But the comfortable suburban

Church continues on its comfortable suburban way, secure in its

illusions and delusions.

One day, however, the truth it has so assiduously endeavored to

ignore, deny and suppress will dawn upon it with undeniable and

terrifying reality, and maybe some of those bishops will realize how ill

they served their people by enforcing and reinforcing their ignorance

and complacency.

“‘There’s No Such Thing as Moderate Islam’: An Iraqi Priest

Describes the Christian Genocide,” by Matteo Matzuzzi, Il Foglio,

August 26, 2015 (translated by Francesca Romana, Rorate Caeli):

Rome. 

“Please, if there’s anyone who still thinks ISIS doesn’t

represent Islam, know that they are wrong. ISIS represents Islam

one hundred percent.” Father Douglas al Bazi, an Iraqi Catholic

parish priest in Erbil, raised his voice during an intervention at the

Meeting in Rimini, with a choice of words – in a provocative way

and in hard tones – that few had ventured use so far.

He carries on his own body the scars of the torture he underwent

nine years ago, when a band of Jihadists kidnapped him for nine

days, keeping him in chains and blindfolds along with a broken

nose from being kneed: “For the first four days they didn’t even give

me anything to drink. They would walk past me saying ‘Father, do

you want some water?’ All day long they would listen to the reading

of the Koran to let the neighbours hear what good believers they

were.”…

Father Douglas Al Bazi is in charge of two refugee shelters for

Christians who survived the advance of the black horde – not far

from Ankawa. After the marking of houses with the “n” of the

Nazarene plus the Christians displaced on the Nineveh plain, a year

ago, “from morning to night we receive thousands of refugees” and

the exodus continues. “I’m proud to be an Iraqi, I love my country.

But my country is not proud that I’m part of it. What is happening to

my people is nothing other than genocide. I beg you: do not call it a

conflict. It’s genocide”, said the priest, who doesn’t want to hear

anything about “moderate Islam”: “When Islam lives amidst you, the

situation might appear acceptable. But when one lives amidst

Muslims, everything becomes impossible. I’m not here to instigate

you to hate Islam. I was born amid Muslims and I have more friends

among them than I have with Christians. But people change and if

we go to my country, no-one will be able to distinguish the light

from the darkness. There are those who say: “but I have lots of

Muslim friends who are very nice”. Yes, certainly! They are nice over

here! Over there the situation is very different!”

A situation in which regard the vice-President of the French

Conference for Imams also had some tough words to say. Hocine

Drouiche, also the Imam of Nimes, intervened last July at the

European Parliament: “In the world, Christians are being

persecuted, hunted down, deprived of work, imprisoned, tortured

and murdered. All means are being used to force them to deny their

faith, including the ritual of collective rape, considered in some

states a form of penal sanction. Owning a Bible has become a

crime, religious worship is prohibited and there has been a return to

the times of Masses in the caves and the first martyrs”. And the

fault, Drouiche had added in a discourse which had not been

highlighted very much by the European media”, is contemporary

Islam”, which is much closer “to sectarianism rather than a

universal, open religion”.

“I believe in the end they will destroy us”

Father al Bazi’s account is of one who runs the risk of being

murdered on the street every day: We never know if coming out of

the church we’ll be able to go into it again alive. In Baghdad they

had the church explode right in front of me. They shot me on the

legs with a AK-47, a type of Kalashnikov, and probably sooner or

later they’ll kill me”. Yet his faith is solid: “When they put me in

chains, during my kidnapping, they tightened a big padlock on my

wrists. On the chain there were ten extra rings, which I used to

recite the Rosary. I have never prayed it so earnestly as I did in that

situation”. “I – added Father Douglas – don’t implore your help. I’m

not frightened just as my people aren’t frightened either. I believe

they’ll destroy us in the end. But I also believe that we will have the

last word. Jesus told us that we need to carry our own crosses, and

that is what we in the Middle East are doing. Yet the most important

thing is not the carrying of the cross, but following it. And following it

means accepting, challenging and committing oneself right to the

very end”.

“We need to have patience and carry the cross each day, but we

also must react”, said Father Ibrahim Alsabagh, parish priest in

Aleppo, echoing him, and reported how the city is now “divided in

tens of parts, each one of them in the hands of a different group of

Jihadists. Our Church of St. Francis is sixty metres from the firing

line. They have already hit many churches, we don’t know when it

will be our turn”. Here is why Father Douglas, at the end of his

intervention, launched a warning to the feeble West:

“Wake up! The cancer is at your door. They will destroy you. We,

the Christians of the Middle East are the only group that has seen

the face of evil: Islam”….

However, the Christians suffering at the hands of ISIS are not the only victims. Kurds, Yazidis, and other infidels - even other muslims who are not the same sect of islam as those who rally under the ISIS banner - are being killed, or made into sex slaves and sold to be raped and otherwise abused. Or raped and abused and then sold for others to rape and abuse, often until their "owners" tire of them and kills them.

Is it not incredible that there are so many, in this country and elsewhere across the world, who can close their eyes and their ears and convince themselves that islam is a "religion of peace"? This foul cult of rapine, child molestation and murder needs to be eradicated. Those who follow orthodox islam need to be exterminated as the vermin they truly are.

islamic rules of conduct

In visiting some of the web sites that send postings to my email, I came across an article that clearly depicts the depravity, the disgusting, degenerate behavior of those who follow true, orthodox islam. What this sick group of sub-humans believes their moon-god not only permits, but encourages them to do in his name. This is an excerpt from the article:

One of Islam’s highest leaders, the now deceased Ayatollah Khomeni, who lead the Islamic revolution in 1979 in Iran and who, until his death in 1989, was the highest authority of the country, both politically and religiously, also wrote the book Tahrirolvasyleh, which is a collection of Islamic rules of conduct for Muslims. Here he is quoted for: “A man can quench his sexual thirst by use of a baby. The only condition is that he does not penetrate the vagina, but anal sex is okay.” [This is obviously good news for all the other Ayatollahs, imams, and the rest of the muslim perverts (redundant).  I don't doubt that Khomeni made use of this pronouncement himself.]

Elsewhere, he writes that: “It is better if a girl marries so early that she gets her first period in the home of her husband rather than in the home of the father. Every father who gives his daughter away in marriage at such an early age will have obtained a place in heaven.” [Considering that muslims are permitted - even encouraged - to have full-penetration sex with their child brides when they reach the age of nine - the age when mohammed "married" Aisha - as well as anal sex with infants, any female child will most likely bleed long before her first menses.]

And further: “A man can have anal sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels, etc. However, he should kill the animal after ejaculating.” It should be noted that their rules say the meat from the animal used for sex may not be sold in his village. It goes on to say that the meat can be sold in any other village. There is no requirement to inform the buyer that the animal - no, not meaning the muslim seller - is not a virgin.

And some words on the rights of women: “A woman who has entered into a true state of matrimony does not have the right to leave the house without her husband’s permission – she must be available to him and fulfill his every need and must not refuse to give herself to him unless there is a valid religious reason.” ["A true state of matrimony refers to the women subject to the "married for one night" rules that muslims use to "work around" the qur'an when they want a strange piece and don't have any slaves handy, or anyone available to rape.]

Khomeni also does not think that a husband having anal sex with his own son is a valid reason for divorce: “If a man has anal sex with his son, brother or father after he is married, the marriage is to continue.” [Khomeni - who probably pitches as well as catches - certainly didn't want to reduce the pool of available partners.]

This is islam. The pseudo-religion, the death cult, that our dear Zebra/Soetero/the Obamination loves and supports. He is obviously not a muslim, but he loves muslims and enjoys emulating them from time to time. I wouldn't be at all surprised to discover he is into bacha bazi, too.

[Update 11/15/15. Several of the links given above have failed, so here is a current one that is still running: https://txlady706.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/ayatollah-ruhollah-khomeini-mohammed-and-the-muslims-say-that-sex-with-children-is-ok-sex-with-animals-is-ok-men-having-sex-with-boys-is-ok-and-female-genital-mutilation-is-required-excerpts/]

A sad day for me - so long, WRSA

I've followed Western Rifle Shooters Association for a number of years, now. Pete (CA) is one of the good guys, and posts things that are good for those of us who value liberty to read and be aware of. Sometimes he posts articles from authors/bloggers who I disagree with, but that is fine with me. I don't expect to agree with everyone, nor do I expect everyone to agree with me.

Today though, I found WRSA had crossed a line I am unable to support. Very few people read my pathetic excuse for a blog, but nonetheless, I cannot list WRSA as a blog I follow any longer, because I don't want it assumed I go along with what I read today.

The post is titled "ASK sends" and deals with a rally supporting Israel and condemning Obama/Kerry's "deal" with Iran.

I am in favor of supporting Israel, the only country that approaches being a democracy in the Middle East, a country that deserves our support (and if I need to explain and/or justify that to you, save yourself some grief and stop reading now).

I believe Pete (CA) supports Israel, too, but in this instance, he has confused free speech with providing a forum to Neo-Nazi's, "Anti-Zionists", and the rest of the drooling, mindless, Jew-hating crowd. I never realized just how many of the Jew/Israel haters there were in the III% movement until now. Oh, sure, I knew there were some, but it seems as if every slimy, low-IQ, Zionist-conspiracy-loving drooling idiot jumped at the chance to make himself known in the comments on Pete's blog. 

It's his blog. He can do what he wants with it (not like he needs - or wants - my permission ;-) But I'll be damned if I will continue to echo his blog on my site and have anyone at all think that I am in favor of these Jew-hating drooling idiots.

Are there Jews that are scum? Of course - look no further than Soros, who made his first money turning in fellow Jews to the Nazis. Who still hates his fellow Jews and has no problem contemplating - perhaps even assisting in - their annihilation as a culture, a religion, and - in Israel - a country. Marx was a Jew, for heaven's sake, and there are many others who have caused untold harm to the world and their own people. 

But the Jewish race as a whole has done untold good for the world as well. A great deal of life-saving medical technology and other cutting-edge technology has been developed in Israel since it became a country. The Jews are more frequently representative of greatness within the human race via music, art, medicine, physics, chemistry, and so many other areas of human knowledge and accomplishment.

Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) said it so well, many years ago:

If the statistics are right, the Jews constitute but one percent of the human race. It suggests a nebulous dim puff of star dust lost in the blaze of the Milky Way. Properly the Jew ought hardly to be heard of; but he is heard of, has always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness of his bulk. His contributions to the world's list of great names in literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and abstruse learning are also way out of proportion to the weakness of his numbers. He has made a marvelous fight in this world, in all the ages; and has done it with his hands tied behind him. He could be vain of himself and be excused for it. The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away; the Greek and Roman followed, and made a vast noise, and they are gone; other peoples have sprung up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmity of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind.

So, I will separate myself from supporting a blog that forgets the difference between permitting free speech and becoming a forum for the deranged fools who think the "Elders of Zion" was meant to be an instruction manual, words to live by. Pete certainly won't miss me, and I have no desire whatsoever to demean or accuse him of anything, other than - in my opinion, only - poor judgment. 

Anyone who has read much of my blog knows how I feel about the sub-human creatures who follow the death cult called "islam". If I were to allow a bunch of muslim scum to publish comments about the Jews on my blog in the interest of "freedom of speech" I would be making a monumental mistake, too. 

I guarantee that you won't see that here. And that goes now for WRSA, I am afraid. Take care, Pete. I do wish you well.

ISIS - all its members, associates, and admirers - need to be exterminated with extreme prejudice

0 7 -13 -15

ISIS Blows Up A BABY For

Demonstration

Arabic media reports say ISIS trainer taught recruits booby-trap methods by blowing up infant child of (a) man executed beforehand.

In arguably one of its cruelest acts yet, the Islamic State (ISIS) has reportedly blown up a

baby as part of a demonstration showing how to handle explosives. So reports The Clarion

Project.

The unparalleled incident took place in Diyala Province, eastern Iraq, this past Friday,

according to Sadiq el-Husseini, Security Committee Chairman of the province on behalf of

the anti-ISIS forces there. He recounted the event to the local Arabic-language A-Sumeriah

News.

"The organization booby-trapped the baby in front of dozens of armed ISIS men," el-

Husseini said, "and then detonated it from afar." He explained that the purpose of the

operation, including the rigging of the baby and the detonation of the explosives attached to it, was part of an ISIS training exercise teaching various booby-trapping techniques.

"The organization doesn't care about the most basic human values," said el-Husseini. "Their crimes are incalculable, and the blowing up of the baby is the best proof of the threat of ISIS ideology to the state."

The baby's father was apparently executed some weeks ago, after being accused of taking

part in the killing of an Islamic State member.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As I've said before, ISIS is the accurate and complete expression of islam, the most perfect followers of the commands of the qu'ran, as spoken by the "prophet" (P*ss Be Onto Him), mohammed. Supposedly at the direction of his moon-god, allah.

Now, I realize any true muslim, following the qu'ran and hadith, probably wouldn't be all that upset by the death of their child (as opposed to a child bride or "beardless boy", which would deprive them of their pedophiliac sex object), especially if it was a female child (the article above does not state which gender). Nonetheless, giving the man - who might not have even been muslim - the benefit of the doubt, I am glad he was killed before seeing what became of his child.

I'll bet this was not shown on the mainstream news. I'll bet there was no mention of it on CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, or even Fox. I don't watch television, so it is quite possible I am wrong, and it was shown by some TV news source, although I doubt it.

Come on, folks. Even as screwed up as liberals are, only those who are in favor of "partial-birth" abortions, and those scum who think it is okay to kill fully delivered infants as well, would be comfortable with this. You know, like Eric Holder's wife, who I understand owns an abortion clinic in Georgia. But, hey - her clinic probably aborts mostly black babies, or maybe half-black babies. I wonder what our country would be like right now if Barry Soetero's mother had gone to her clinic?

So, let's hear it for all of those folks who want to "co-exist" with islam, and all those feminists who claim being looked at funny - or denied a cake - means they have been mind-raped, yet don't say a damned word about the abuses women all over the world suffer at the hands of muslims - who aren't "radical", they are orthodox, adhering strictly to the words of the qu'ran.

Are you seeing a pattern here? Finally? Or are you still in denial? Like Michael Z. Williamson.

July 22, 2015:

I just had to add a postscript here. Looking at the poster of Holder and his wife, I noticed they both actually look more white than black. Their features aren't what one would expect from people of the negroid race. Is Mrs. Holder even black at all? Is her hair style just an attempt to show solidarity with her (black/half-black/less-than-half-black?) husband? I'll have to poke around a bit and see what I can find out.

SCOTUS legislates from the bench

I don't watch TV - haven't since 1987 (yes, 28 years ago) when I last had cable, so that I could watch Discovery and a few other sometimes-interesting and educational shows. Between commercials, the liberal BS you had forced down your throat by National Geographic, Discovery, and others ("AGW will ruin the Earth!", "islam is the religion of peace"), and the fact that the news was leaning farther Left than the Tower of Pisa, when I moved to where it was satellite or nothing, I chose "nothing". I can't tell you how glad I am that I did. I still watch videos - although it is getting harder and harder to find movies that aren't made with actors that are so liberal they need a glass navel to be able to navigate (like Liam Neeson, who says those of us who support the Second Amendment are scum - and I use to really enjoy some of the movies he made, like Shindler's List and Taken).

So, reduced to getting my news from the Internet - where I can at least choose sources that don't originate from unicorn poop and Ted Turner's rusty sheriff's badge - I am often late reading about current events. Such as SCOTUS creating laws, instead of ruling on the Constitutionality of laws, which is what they were, IIRC, created to do.

While I am not at all surprised that they decided that Obamacare could be interpreted to mean anything they wanted it to mean, I am actually more bothered by the gay marriage ruling. Not because I care if a couple of rump-rangers or beaver-biters play house (truth be told, I've known some really nice people of both persuasions), but because it opens the rest of us up to abuse by .gov if we refuse to bend over for them.

There was once a time when many, many businesses sported a sign at their entrance informing anyone looking to enter that they reserved the right to refuse service to anyone. We have a small restaurant in the little town closest to where I live which has such a sign. They can probably get away with it for a while, for two reasons: here in the Wild West it is pretty well accepted that things are done differently from how they are in Sodom-on-the-Bay, the City of Angles, Sea-Cattle, and other hotspots of Liberal/"Progressive" culture.  You know - where the most commonly used keys on a computer keyboard are     C:  <enter>:  ###   (Think about it. Sorry. The Devil made me do it ;-)

To get serious, this decision to give gays - along with blacks, trannys, illegal aliens, and muslims - special privileges and treatment will literally come back to haunt us. You may be willing to accept the fact that you will no longer be able to live by your own religious creed, personal choices, or cultural imperatives if they include remaining separate from gays. You will find yourself sued not only for refusing service to gays in small businesses, but what if you are the pastor of a church that believes gay sex is sinful and some gays insist - simply because they CAN - that you marry them? And that you use their own vows to do so (I, Bruce, take Frederick for richer or for poorer, to have and to hold, from behind and in the mouth, with and without lubrication, for so long as my supply of Viagra and my c*ck-ring keep me hard."  Yes, that's gross, and I have an evil and dirty mind, but do you really think such could never happen? Will said pastor, his family and his brethren be pleased when he is fined, jailed, and his church is closed or condemned by .gov and the courts because he refused to participate in a marriage ceremony such as that?

This will get worse, people. For some time now (ten years that I am aware of), there has been a push by psychiatrists, psychologists, "bio-ethicists", anthropologists, "ethno-psychologists", [unicorns] and many actual pederasts in positions of authority (.gov, large corporations, bishops and cardinals, etc.) to remove pedophilia from - and to declare it normal behavior - the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for mental disorders), the manual used by those in mental health professions and the courts for determining what mental conditions are disorders, what the criteria are for judging that someone is not behaving in a normal, safe, and acceptable way.

These people, supposedly intelligent, reasoning human beings, want to decriminalize - make culturally acceptable - sex by adults with pre-pubescent children. Not only would this in reality constitute rape of children, since they would be too young to provide true consent and in most cases be true rape, but it would decriminalize intercourse by strangers, family members, teachers, priests and ministers, camp councilors, Boy and Girl Scout troop leaders, doctors, and anyone else desiring to have sex with a child. This would legitimize marriage of nine-year-old little girls for the muslim scum who want to follow in the footsteps of their child-molesting prophet, mohammed (p*ss be onto him).

Should this happen, should SCOTUS rule in the same fashion as it has with gay marriage, it would be illegal to prevent it from happening with your own children.  Considering the protections and privileges  provided to gays at this point by local, state, and Federal courts,  it could be ruled illegal for you to prevent the victimization - sexually - of your own children by their teachers, their doctors, their councilors at summer camp, by Senators and Representatives, by the AIDS-infected chickenhawk living down the street from you. Refusing to allow access to your own children could easily be ruled discriminatory.

Yes, yes, I know this sounds absurd, over the top. But it isn't. Who would have thought that a bakery owner could be fined thousands of dollars and forced out of business for refusing to bake someone a cake, or cater a gay wedding reception? Who would have thought that a church would be forced - against their deeply held beliefs and their own religious teachings - to provide contraceptive coverage for the people they employ? Why should it be that gays and sexually promiscuous people have greater rights than those provided for by the First Amendment? It says freedom of  religion, and was only written to prevent the State from establishing its own religion and requiring us to practice it.

This country was formed to a great extent by people who fled England and Europe because they were persecuted for their religious beliefs. And now it is happening again. Yet, when the beliefs of muslims interfere with or threaten the rights of Christian, Jews, and even atheists, the muslims "rights" take precedence over everyone else's. It has become a pejorative term these days to be called "Christian", in spite of the fact that this country was formed as a Christian nation, based upon the Judeo-Christian moral code. Yes, there were atheists and deists back then, some of whom were Founding Fathers. But even those individuals accepted and lived by the same moral codes as the Jews and the Christians.

The Left is doing everything it can to destroy the moral codes this country was founded upon and which kept us healthy and striving to be good, to live together in harmony. Caligula would recognize the direction the Left is moving us in - the debasement of the family, sexuality, marriage, truth and justice. He would feel quite comfortable in today's America. There is already enough debasement of women, teenage girls and boys, and even of small children in this country to drive a moral man into a towering rage at what is happening. The Left is pleased by this, and would like to see it taken even further. Nor do they complain or protest the rape of women and little girls by muslims throughout the world, the use of young boys for sex by muslims in every country where muslims live, the sexual enslavement and killing of "infidel" women and girls.

If the Left is successful, as I am very afraid they will be, at legalizing pederasty, the rape and molestation of children, female and male (look up NAMBLA - I refuse to provide a link - but be prepared to puke), then I am hoping parents and moral men and women in this country will take up arms and declare open season not just on the pederasts, molesters, but also upon the people - like Peter Singer - who helped to make it happen. Will you protect your children, your grandchildren? I hope so.