The German People Really Were Guilty

Thank you, thank you, Pete at WRSA, for posting a link to powerofnarrative.blogspot, called Once Upon a Time. In it, the author of the blog writes about a book, Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany, which describes and documents excellent reasons to believe that the German people were well aware of the death and destruction rained upon the Jews, the Poles, the Gypsies, and others who died at the hands of the Third Reich.

There are those in the Liberty movement, the Patriot movement, who probably are fairly decent and well-meaning individuals, but people with whom I will have no truck. Why? Because they are apologists for the German people, for the horrific abuses and murders of over six million human beings, simply because the Germans pursued Communists with a vengeance.

Yes, the Marxists have been responsible for much of the sorry state of our country today, for the move toward fascism that our country has taken since FDR, and appears ready to consummate with this Administration. Certainly, the Soviets and the Chinese killed many times more of their own citizens as the Nazis. Does that excuse the German people, or should they be forgiven because they fought the Commies (after initially siding with them before Hitler decided it would be more fun to stab them in the back?) No chance in Hell.

In a description of the book at Amazon:

Extensively documented, highly readable and illustrated with never-before-published photographs, Backing Hitler convincingly debunks the myth that Nazi atrocities were carried out in secret. From the rise of the Third Reich well into the final, desperate months of the war, the destruction of innocent lives was inextricably linked to the will of the German people.

The operative phrase being, "the will of the German people."

Further:

Debate still rages over how much ordinary Germans knew about the concentration camps and the Gestapo's activities during Hitler's reign. Now, in this well-documented and provocative volume, historian Robert Gellately argues that the majority of German citizens had quite a clear picture of the extent of Nazi atrocities, and continued to support the Reich to the bitter end.

The author of the post goes on to relate the book to our current situation, with Obama's "kill list" and the host of other fascist Changes he has made to our country (I use to list these as "socialist", until Thomas Sowell corrected my thinking on the difference). So, we as a society are no better than the German people were during the rise to power of Hitler and his attempt to establish a Third Reich. Our government has become so corrupt and overbearing that we might as well call Barack "Adolph", and far too many American citizens think such government is acceptable.

Yes, there were scattered individuals in Germany who did what they could, such as Herr Schindler, just as there are people in this country who recognize the horror of our government running amok. But there were far too few in Nazi Germany. The average German citizen was proud of what Hitler and his cronies did, had no problem whatsoever with the removal of those "filthy Jews" from "polite" society.

In his post at Once Upon a Time, the author mentions the possibility of Arabs, muslims, being persecuted and rounded up as terrorists. He needs to be corrected on that notion, as we have seen - especially in places like Dearborn, MI, where muslims threw rocks and bottles at some men who were silently holding signs critical of Islam while police stood by and did nothing - that muslims will continue to be held blameless and allowed all manner of criminality in the service of political correctness. Instead, the terrorists will be you and me, people who speak out against the State, people who try to be honest and forthright. We are the ones who will be rounded up, not the muslims.

And if you truly believe it will never happen, ask one of the few people of Japanese history who lived through the detention of all Japanese Americans - recent immigrants and natural born American citizens of Japanese descent - how they liked being forced to live in a concentration camp, right here in America. Ask the few people who survived the FBI assault with tanks and helicopters on the men, women, and children of Mt. Carmel in Waco, Texas.

Then ask this grandmother how much she enjoyed the stun grenades thrown through her living room window, simply because the police suspected that someone in her house might have been responsible for saying some bad things about their police department.

Does it not fill you with rage, or at least terrify you, that our law enforcement personnel are willing to act entirely outside of the rule of law? Does it not move you want to reply in kind when you realize that these lawless scum with badges will never suffer any consequences stronger than a little bad press - and only from alternative media, never MSM? It should.

So, let it be said that we here in America are indeed guilty of not raising hell when this behavior occurs. Although I'll be damned if I can figure out what we could have done. Some think we could have voted our way out of it, forced the bad politicians out of office. When has that ever worked before? How many Presidents have been impeached? Two. How many have been convicted? Zero. (Yes, Nixon resigned before he was impeached, but he probably would not have been convicted either.) The political system is rigged to protect its own, especially when it comes to the Executive Office.

I'd like to think there are more of us who speak out against the current political atrocities than ever spoke out in Germany during the thirties and forties against the actual, physical atrocities of Jews being beaten, burned out of their homes, killed or sent to concentration camps.. Unfortunately, I think we will be just as unsuccessful at creating any groundswell of indignation as were those few decent Germans.

Follow The Ideology

I caught Bill Whittle's video called, "Follow the Ideology" (instead of "follow the money") on Kevin's "The Smallest Minority" blog a few minutes ago. It concerns Obama's use of executive privilege to seal documents connected with the Fast and Furious program of which he and Eric Holder are obviously a part, or perhaps even the prime movers.

Please, please view it. If you have the time, listen to the podcast the David Kopel that is listed also, but do NOT miss Bill Whittle's short video. The photos above are of murdered innocent Mexican citizens who were killed by Mexican cartel members, supposedly with some of the weapons provided by Holder's Fast and Furious scam.

All Too True redux

Just saw this on another web site, the Scottcarp Dream, and knew it was a perfect addendum to my previous post.

If you have a moment, and want to be completely scandalized as well as motivated to immediately remove your children from public (government) school, read his post on a book being used to teach children in the Toronto, Canada school system. It is being used to teach them that gender is not fixed, and that cross-dressing is perfectly acceptable.

All too true

While all of us who have followed the "Fast and Furious" debacle through the blogosphere realize it is merely tragic opera, black comedy, a lot of noise that will signify nothing in the end, this cartoon I ran across at The Smallest Minority portrays Obama's hyprocrisy perfectly. The man - and I say that loosely - is a total scumbag, a waste of good oxygen. Someday I will tell you what I really think of this walking shit-stain.

All because he and his Presidential leg-humping attack dog, Holder, thought they could use the murder of some Mexican nationals to justify further gun control in America. I'd say that they both deserve to share a cell with the nastiest rapist in the filthiest Mexican prison, but those two would probably enjoy it.

[Editorial addition: Speaking of putting Holder in prison, read this post from Free North Carolina, where he reposts an article from Godfather Politics.]

A Dire Warning

Thanks to Pete at WRSA, I have read an article by a blogger, Anthony Martin, who writes of his feelings that a dire event is likely to occur in the not-too-distant future. He speaks of his intuition, which he says is often correct, and goes on at length concerning his reasons for this. I have to chuckle a bit - not at his writing, which is eloquent and informed, but simply because he is as verbose as I tend to be. That being said, I cannot chuckle at his warning, because I agree with it one hundred percent, and for the very same reasons he gives.

I have stated before that we may well face a manufactured event, a false flag incident perhaps, that will be used as an excuse by Obama to either postpone elections, possibly along with the imposition of martial law to suppress any response by citizens who refuse to accept such an occurrence, or he may simply declare himself the winner of any elections that are held, just as Ahmadinejad did in Iran when he was "elected" President of that country. You only have to consider the numerous times he has side-stepped Congress and the Constitutional limits placed upon the powers of the Executive Office to understand the danger. Such as his recent "executive order" providing an amnesty that was defeated in Congress when it was offered as the "Dream Act". He is a deviant man, an arrogant man, who refuses to be thwarted in any way. I believe he will refuse to be thwarted when it comes to who is President next January.

Mr. Martin writes well and explains his thought process and reasoning better than I can. Please use the link to read his article. Yes, it is lengthy, but it is worth reading in full. If the link does not work for any reason, go to:

http://thelibertysphere.blogspot.com/2012/06/musings-after-midnight-dire-warning.html

Photographic Evidence-at the White House LGBT party

I have posted before, on a number of occasions, my belief that the Pretender-in-Chief is gay, or at least bi-sexual, although my guess is that his marriage is a sham, a marriage of political convenience. Let's face it: the country was obviously ready for its first black President, but its first gay, black President? I think not. I'm quite certain that the political machine of Soros/Saudi Arabia/the Chicago Boys knew damn well that that would never fly.

Yes, the country - which the Left and the flatulent mouthpieces of the administration (like Axelrod) claim is racist, any time someone disagrees with them - did indeed vote for a black President in large numbers. I won't go so far as to say he was actually elected by them, because of the massive voter fraud perpetrated by ACORN, the machinery of the Left, and the Democratic Party (but I repeat myself).

Now, I am one of those nefarious "Birthers", a person who suspects there is a very good reason that Obama has sealed all records of his birth, childhood, schooling and college activity (no, the "Record of Live Birth" is not only not a legal birth certificate, it has been proven beyond a doubt to have been a manipulated and false document). That reason is because it would not bear any scrutiny. That it would prove him to have been ineligible to run for the office of the President, let alone be elected.

However, that is not the point of this post (that was only inserted to get the Lefties to go into overload and stroke out, if they read this at all ;-) The point is that we have as our first black President another first along with that: our first gay President. The reason I say gay, rather than bi-sexual, is because based on his behavior I sincerely believe a check of the DNA of both of Michelle's daughters would prove that he was not their biological father.

Of course, I am prepared to be proven wrong on this assertion. He might have bit the bullet, so to speak, and A) provided some sperm for Michelle to be artificially inseminated with, or B) actually gritted his teeth and inserted his tiny member between those massive thighs.

Considering the size of those thighs, and the probable deficit in length of his junk, I would vote for AI, if he is biologically involved at all. And don't even think to suggest he might have used a different position. Michelle obviously suffers from steatopygia, so that would be a non-starter even if he were equipped like Long John Holmes (the porn star).

Finally, we know that Obama, or at least little Barry Soetero, spent some "quality time" with Frank Marshall Davis, who is believed to have had "short eyes" (pedophilia). As young as Barry was at that time, I'm quite certain the mulatto factor would have been attractive to Davis. Even if, as I have stated before, Davis was indeed Barry's biological father, we all know that it is not that uncommon for some fathers to molest their own children. Consider, further, that Davis was a racist and a Communist (literally a member of the CPA), he may not have felt that producing offspring from sex with a white upper-class woman was anything for which he needed to claim responsibility.

I can understand looking at Obama on a girl's bike and thinking "Dork!" rather than "Faggot!". But, how can you possibly look at that feminine simper on his face at the White House celebration of LGBT Day and not shout "Faggot!" Apologies to my gay friends, but as with most cultures, gays speak derogatorily of each other, just as blacks call each other "nigga". So, allow me to borrow a word from gay culture that certainly applies to a simpering fool who is obviously enjoying touching another very gay man. From the look on Homobama's face, he wanted everyone in attendance to know that he was enjoying it.

Closing the Trap

This morning I began re-reading Garet Garrett's brilliant treatise, "The Revolution Was". In it he describes how FDR, along with those "fellow travelers", those fellow Marxists who shared his vision, his agenda, launched functioning Communism in this country. How he and his ilk brought real Marxism into being within the workings of government and in the day-to-day existence of American society.

Garrett explained that those who were warning that it was going to happen were deluded, that it had already taken place while the country slept, or at least did not notice. He spoke of the fact that the meaning of words used to describe the free market, government, the intricacies of American society, had morphed. How the Left - the Communists, the Marxists of his day - had intentional changed the meaning of words that were in continuing use, but which meant something far different from what they had before.

Do we not see this happening today? When the Left speaks of the failure of capitalism, when it speaks of the favoritism and corruption of capitalism and the free market, but is actually speaking of the crony capitalism practiced by those in power, and especially by Obama and his cronies. When the left speaks of racism, but actually means any speech or actions it does not approve of that has taken place? When it speaks of unemployment, but is actually speaking of those people who are actively enrolled in state-operated unemployment programs, ignoring all those who have given up searching for work, or who are under-employed to the point of losing their homes, with children going hungry?

Obama and those who run the little homo puppet are simply attempting to close the trap. They have grown government by an order of magnitude over even the worst that both Bushes were capable of, members of CFR and the elitists that they are. What many people haven't yet figured out is that the Bush administrations wanted to accomplish the growth of control over the country incrementally, while Obama and those who pull his arrogant, egotistical strings can no longer wait, are unwilling to be patient. They want it now.

Consequently, they are employing - as I and many others have already mentioned - the Cloward-Piven strategy, where destruction of the economy will lead to dependence of the majority of the population upon the largess of government. If permitting the total loss of every bit of liberty, of sovereignty, is what it takes to feed and shelter a man and his family, he is likely to accept his role as slave.

Garrett wrote:

"The scientific study of revolution included, of course, analysis of opportunity. First and always, the

master of revolutionary technique is an opportunist. He must know opportunity when he sees it in the

becoming; he must know how to stalk it, how to let it ripen, how to adapt his means to the realities.

The basic ingredients of opportunity are few; nearly always it is how they are mixed that matters. But

the one indispensable ingredient is economic distress, and, if there is enough of that, the mixture will

take care of itself." (Emphasis mine.)

So, we have a combination we see happening before our very eyes, spoken of by Obama and his useful tools such as Rahm Emanuel ("You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.") We have the intentional destruction of the economy by Obama and his masters together with the verbally admitted use of opportunity - "serious crisis", in the words of Emanuel. Can anyone reading this post deny that this country is currently experiencing economic distress?

This country has been living a mild, not yet fully realized form of Marxism - a species of socialism - since FDR at the very least. To those in the Liberty movement who rant about how it is the fault of the "Boomers" that we are in such a mess, I say, "Please get your heads out of your nether cheeks, and understand it happened long before the Boomers were even a gleam in their daddy's eyes." We - the Boomers, along with those few of the Greatest Generation still alive - didn't make it any better, but neither did we make it worse. It is the natural progression of the agenda conceived not long after Marx and Lenin codified Communism, and the elite of our country, TPTB, the brokers, kingmakers, the members of CFR began to institute it here in this country.

Read all of Garrett that you can find. He was a brilliant, perceptive man, and his rational and cogent explanation of what had already taken place back during the reign of FDR will convince all but those unwilling to hear the truth. It will be time well spent, even if somewhat depressing. It is information you need, however, if you are going to understand the dimensions of what we face and what we must fight if we are ever to recover Liberty, in our time or in the future.

WTF? Nero fiddles while Caligula bends him over.

Or should that be, Barry Soetero bends over his putter, while Eric Holder goes Fast and Furious?

If I ever needed convincing that this country has become so sickeningly perverted and wrong, this news article I stumbled across would do it: not that I have any doubt that the Miss USA contest has been rigged or manipulated, now and in the past, but the decision of the organizers of the contest to allow TRANSGENDER males to enter and compete just completely boggles my freaking (out) mind.

How have we come to this? Isn't it bad enough to allow girls to be BOY Scouts? Or to allow gay men - who so very often are sexually interested in young boys - to be Scoutmasters, and go on overnight sleep-outs with their young charges? (Don't misunderstand me - heterosexual child molesters are just as bad.) Isn't it bad enough that the city of San Francisco - or maybe it was the county, I don't recall - has arranged the medical insurance they provide for their employees to include elective surgical sex-change to be covered by the insurance that the citizens of the city (or county) have to pay for with their taxes?

Are you aware there are psychiatrists and psychologists (probably all pedophiles themselves) who want pedophilia removed from the DSM list of abnormal behaviors? That there are "ethicists" - people like Peter Singer - and philosophers, college professors, and politicians (that group doesn't surprise me) who agree with this aberrant notion, who want sex with children to be acceptable and legal?

Are you aware that all penalties for sodomy and bestiality have been removed from the Uniform Code of Military Justice? So that the gays and the muslims in the military can't be arrested or discharged for sex with each other or with animals. (At least most gays are satisfied with each other. The muslims want sex with each other, with young boys, and with animals - all but the sex with other adult males being permitted by the Qur'an.) Ask any servicemen you know who served in Afghanistan and in Pakistan about the Paki and Afghani troops sleeping with each other, and about whether donkeys are safe in those countries.

Are you aware that schools in this country - in places back East like Boston, and in many other cities and towns across the country - are teaching grade school children how to put a condom on a banana, and that gay and lesbian sex is perfectly acceptable? That Obama has a "science advisor", John Holden, who has told very young boys they should be willing to submit when an older man wants to have sex with them, that it is all right to do so?

I am not a parent, and with the exception of a few years living with two different women, at different times of course, I have done very little parenting myself. Nonetheless, I cannot understand how you could be a parent and not experience the most incredible outrage to know how your children are being taught, indoctrinated, brain-washed into believing that these perversions are acceptable and proper.

If you have the ability, the opportunity to home school your children, you should do so, even if it is difficult and a struggle. "Socializing" them, as the shrinks and sociologists and "educators" would have you believe is necessary in order to enable them to be well-rounded individuals and develop their full potential is bullshit. Plain and simple. You do not want them socializing with teachers and other students who will sway them toward the perversions which so many on the Left feel are just fine and dandy, and which our current collectivist (and that includes all the RINOs who compromise the majority of the GOP) government supports.

If you simply cannot home school, then you must involve yourself in their education and spend the time with them needed to discover what perverted crap they are being taught so that you can counter it with proper Judeo-Christian morality. You must also see that they learn that the history and "social studies" they are taught in the public schools are twisted and incorrect, as well.

If I believed in G-d, I would be very fearful of the destruction of the world by Him due to how low and disgusting human society and "civilization" has become. To me it seems as if Sodom and Gomorrah has returned, is being re-lived at the present time. I'm sure it is this bad in many other countries across the world as well, especially in countries and regions which embrace the sick perversion that is Islam. Part of me is certain that the human race does not deserve to continue, since we can allow these things to happen - and happen to our children.

In a very real way, IMVHO, the downfall that Europe, our country - and by extension, the rest of the world - may well experience via economic calamity and the civil disturbances, riots (possibly even warfare) that will accompany the destruction of the interdependent world economy, is nothing less than what we deserve. If - more likely when - the world's economies collapse like a series of dominoes due to unsupportable debt and the hyperinflation that will probably occur, it will be because we here in America allowed those evil men and women who gravitate to power, who seek dominion over the rest of us, to take control of the incredible gift that the Founders provided for us in the creation of this country, a functional Constitutional Republic. They even warned us that it would require diligence, faithful attention and involvement in order to maintain it, against the natural desire of some men to destroy it, to take control and pervert what was intended into what we now face in a government no longer in our control.

We - the generations since the creation of our Republic - failed in our duty. We did not maintain control over those we placed in the position of representing us and in the positions of running the limited functions of government. Those of you who sit there and wail that it was the "Boomers" or the "greatest Generation" who were responsible for this debacle are blind. We lost our Republic long before those generations were even born. Yes, it has gotten worse, but what have you done better? Occupying Wall Street? Those few who have rallied behind Ron Paul (and I was one, even though a "Boomer")? [We should have been able to see that he is un-electable within the framework of the current political system. It will simply not allow us to make him a viable candidate, let alone elect him to the highest office. So we Paulites have done little as well, other than to demonstrate that there are some who wish to do better than what we are stuck with at present .]

I truly hope that I am completely wrong about what we face as a nation in the way of an economic catastrophe, but as far as I can see the only alternative to that is a fairly quick slide into a totally tyrannical dictatorship where every aspect of our lives is controlled by the state, and we have no ability to travel where we want, eat what we want, read what we want, or say what we want. (Like current air travel, Mayor Bloomberg's and Michelle Obama's desire to control what we eat or drink, the restrictions on what the mainstream media permit us to see in the way of actual news, and the restrictions on what can be said about muslims in many countries.)

Perhaps a world where being heterosexual is against the law, where procreation and child rearing are done only by the State and biological parents are allowed no contact with their children, not even permitted to have children. Where you are not only assigned a place to live, but what you will do for a job, who you are permitted to socialize with, or marry. Perhaps a Universal muslim caliphate, as in the muslim nations where some of those issues are already controlled by the imams.

This is already too long a treatise on the troubles we face. Even if you are religious, praying won't get us out of this fix. "G-d helps those who help themselves" should be the watchwords for those who believe, and "personal responsibility and self-sufficiency" for those of us who don't - hell, for all of us. Please make some preparations for hard times. The times are already difficult, but I feel certain they will get worse. Family, friends, tribes.

And on the Left hand . . .

I'd like to add this quote from our friendly pundit and intellectual mentor, Francis Porretto concerning the Left:

"There are always some whose aspirations to rule will be satisfied. In keeping with Friedrich Hayek's analysis, it is overwhelmingly more likely than not that they will be the most ruthless and least scrupled of all the forces of darkness. In a struggle over political power, those are advantages.

Very seldom have political upheavals not elevated the very worst to the very highest positions. Moreover, the "very worst" are aware of this, which is why one finds a disproportionate number of the unscrupulous -- the liars, the thugs, the embezzlers, and miscellaneous other blackguards -- in the strategy councils of left-oriented movements. Search as long as you like; you will never find anyone resembling Saul Alinsky among conservative or libertarian thinkers. Such a person would rebel against the promotion of individual liberty; he'd seek to undermine it at every opportunity, such that no one on the Right would listen to him.

No, it's on the Left that you'll find the Rahm Emanuels and the David Axelrods, the Jeremiah Wrights and the Al Sharptons, the Tony Rezkos, the Rod Blagojeviches, the Alex Giannoulias, the Bill Ayerses and Bernardine Dohrns."

Most of those individuals are merely clever, such as The Voice Of The Teleprompter, little Barry Soetero/aka Barack Hussein Obama/aka Frank Marshall Davis, Jr.

Obama's ability to move crowds with his voice - similar to the ability of a certain German politician back in the early 1930's - is proven to be simple oratory and not intelligence, when you take away his teleprompter. (Or if you input nonsense into his teleprompter. But his speech writers are not much brighter than he is, evidently.)

There are likely a few evil geniuses somewhere in the woodpile, directing the promotion of the Marxist/socialist agenda. Obama and his cronies, his czars and other political and judicial appointees, are not intelligent so much as devoted to Marxism and to their own political advancement. The horror that faces us is not due to having an extraordinarily intelligent foe in the Left, but in how much we have allowed the Left to assume control of critical infrastructure, such as the education system, the energy system (via the Dept. of Energy), the EPA as well as other important bureaucracies, and many of the Federal courts and appellate courts.

The Communist Party and devoted Marxists have been infiltrating our government, our schools and universities, our banks and economic institutions since the late 1940's, with origins in groups formed even earlier. It may sound like "conspiracy theory", but I guarantee you it is not. "Conspiracy Theory" is simply another tool of the Left to dispute or disparage anything they want the general population to either ignore or condemn as being a fantasy of the Right, of conservatives. However, if you read truly insightful and intelligent authors such as Garet Garret, or G. Edward Griffin's excellent article named "The Future Calling", wherein he lays out the strategy developed and put into play by those who wished to make America a socialist State, starting many years ago with the Fabian Society in England, Cecil Rhodes, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Fund and Foundation, Columbia University, and others whose dreams of a collectivist society across the world motivated them to take the long view - the view that such could be accomplished more easily, albeit over a much longer period of time, if infiltration was used instead of revolution, then you will see that we are not speaking of fantasy.

You will see that this is the reason our schools and universities have become such hotbeds of socialism, of political correctness, of enforced "diversity" (were certain minorities get special treatment), "equality" (everyone gets a gold star), and other agendas destructive to our Constitutional Republic. Remember, "democracy" is what the Left wants us to believe America was supposed to be, where the needs or desires of the group are more important than the rights of the individual - the smallest minority.

The Left would have you believe that the Right is heartless, that is lacks any concern for the weak, the helpless, the poor or disadvantaged. This in spite of the fact that conservatives donate more to charity than liberals do, in spite of the fact that it was the Left - liberal Southern Democrats - who fought so hard to squash the Equal Rights Amendment and the work of Republican senators and Congressmen to see that minorities, especially blacks, had equal rights and equal treatment under law. Isn't it amazing that most of America's black population thinks it was the Left who fought for their rights? Not so amazing when you consider how the Left's control of the media and the schools and universities has warped the story that has reached the ears of children both white and black, as well as their parents.

Just as most of us in this country were taught that the Civil War was about slavery, and that Lincoln loved the black people and wanted what was best for them. Lincoln actually wanted as many blacks as possible to leave America, be deported to Liberia. As Thomas Di Lorenzo noted,

"This was not a one-time flight of fancy for Lincoln. He first proposed deporting blacks to Liberia in an 1854 speech in Peoria, Illinois. In his July 6, 1852 eulogy to Henry Clay, delivered in Springfield, Illinois, Lincoln approvingly quoted Clay's statement that "there is a moral fitness in the idea of returning to Africa her children," which would supposedly be "a single blessing to that most unfortunate" region. This statement by Clay was made twenty-five years ago, said Lincoln, but "every succeeding year has added strength to the hope of its realization. May it indeed be realized!" He continued to voice such sentiments well into his presidency."

There is much to be gained from reading the writings of Garrett, Griffin, and Di Lorenzo. They have been a significant part of my awakening as a non-Republican (big R) conservative, and they will give you a better idea of what the Left has been up to and continues to do.

6/6/2012 addition: I left out a very important group of Marxist long-term planners who have had an incredibly significant affect upon our system of education - the "Frankfurt School".

Please Google them and read various sources concerning their beginning, their agenda, and the success that they and their spiritual heirs have achieved in this country.

400+ Little girls poisoned. Hypocrisy, plain and simple.

Another incidence of muslims bastards poisoning little girls who are sent to school to improve their minds and their lot in life. How sick is that? How vile the perverted muslim bastards who would do such a thing to innocent children, most of whom didn't even have a choice about it in the first place.

We all know - or should know - that the Left is populated by hypocrites. None are more hypocritical than the feminists, such as the fools at NOW. They pretend to support and defend the rights of women, support changes in our culture that will stop the violence of rape and domestic abuse, the general mistreatment of women.

Why is it then we have never heard them speak out against Islam? How is it we have never heard their voices raised about the genital mutilation of female children and young girls? About the honor killings that occur routinely in the Middle East, Europe, and even here in America?

Why is it we read articles by female "pundits" and "journalists" who claim that only Islamophobes speak out against Islam, like this twit, Wendy Kaminer? Women who ignore the Qur'an where it permits full sexual penetration of nine-year-old girls, and"thighing" of female infants?

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:

"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."

Notice that there is no real penalty for a muslim (may he forever rot in Hell) penetrating an infant - the vile rape of an innocent infant girl who is torn and damaged because her vagina is far too small for an adult penis - other than "being responsible for her subsistence". Which means he can basically starve her, use her as a sex slave, beat and otherwise abuse her for the rest of her life, as long as she gets enough food and water to "subsist". He still gets to have four wives - all of whom will further abuse and beat the girl who is barely subsisting on whatever scraps she is allowed. Yes, this happens with great frequency in the backward nations where Islam holds sway. Including with our "good buddies" in Saudi Arabia.

Don't these women on the Left truly care about other women, about little girls, about female infants? Of course not. If they did, they would speak out, they would shout it from the rooftops and from the front pages of all of their Leftist rags, like the New York Times. The reality is that it is simply about power. Not empowering women, but empowering those who pretend to speak for them, who pretend to wish to raise them up into better circumstances, equal pay for equal work, etc., but actually don't care about anything beyond their own enhancement and enrichment.

That actually defines the Left. They pretend care about the poor, the downtrodden, the disadvantaged, when they only wish to use them to advance their agenda of turning America into a socialist State, with their leaders becoming the leaders of us all. Silence while children are poisoned, sexually abused, genitally mutilated, and even killed. Hypocrisy, plain and simple.

Falling down on the job

I try to be a nice guy, and do what's right by others, but being a basically lazy and self-centered jerk I often miss the mark. Recently, reading some of the blogs I like to read, I discovered there are folks who list my blog on their web site. This not only surprises the hell out of me, but makes me cringe for not having noticed sooner and returned the favor. So, I have added some blogs that I read fairly often but missed: Kenny's "Knuckledraggin My Life Away", Miss Violet's (Teresa Sue) "Traditions and Skills", Kevin's "The Smallest Minority", and "The Lizard Farmer".

Please, if you read my pathetic excuse for a blog and list it on your web site, let me know and I will gladly list yours, even if it is one I don't know about or don't visit frequently. My paltry efforts don't deserve wide distribution, but if somehow you decided it is worth sharing, I'd like to return the favor, if I haven't already listed you.

BillyBob, that includes you at Hell On Earth, although I'm not sure I would survive my wife discovering how often I stop by your site to read your erudite and intellectually stimulating photog - er, I mean written posts and comments.

;-)

If Only

Saw this on Kenny's web site, Knuckledraggin My Life Away, and had to post it here. It wouldn't have saved us from eventual hell on earth, but it would have prevented the last three years of it.

Have you stopped to consider the fact that Obama completely ignores his white genes in favor of his black genes? The only reason I can conceive of for that fact is that he learned at an early age how much he could benefit from claiming his "black" (rather than half-black) heritage and denying the white. I'm sure his probably-biological father, Frank Marshall Davis, along with his putative father, BO, Sr., and Lolo Soetero all re-inforced that concept in his mind. When your actual talents are as meager as Obama's demonstrably are, you play the race card for all it is worth.

Obama is worse than an "empty suit", as some have called him. His suit is filled with arrogance, conceit, hatred for America, for whites, for the productive, for those who choose responsibility and self-sufficiency over dependence upon others and upon government handouts, and filled with an inability to understand that his whole life is a sham. That he is an ignorant puppet on a stick, being used by those who have filled what was once a young and empty mind with all of those negative qualities, along with a love of Marxism - as long as he doesn't have to suffer under it himself.

I'm repeating myself, but as worthless as Romney is, the only other choice is to decide you are ready for armed revolution - one which may well fail. Because four more years of Obama, with the gloves completely off, will mean the end of America as it was ever known on this continent. Obama will certainly continue the destruction of the few protections the Constitution still provides. He will ignore what few remaining restrictions there are upon his actions, and he will put America into a state from which it may not recover for decades, if ever.

Yeah, I'm a coward. I'd love to finish the few years remaining to me in relative peace and comfort. I don't want to have to end up dying under fire - or by fire - from resisting a SWAT home invasion or a VIPR road block. Of course, things are already bad enough that I may face that no matter who is elected, but I feel certain it will happen if Obama is re-elected. Or when I see friends attacked by ATF, FBI, DHS, or bankrupted and destroyed by EPA or FDA or DOE, which I feel would be quite likely in the event of a continuing Obama administration.

I'd love to go out quietly, but I feel certain I will not be able to do so. I have a low threshold for injustice - at least for feeling the rage that overcomes me when I read about it or see it. I'm not quite certain what will push me to action, what the final straw or line in the sand will be, but I do not doubt it will occur if this scumwad remains in office unchecked. I don't have many close friends, but I do have friends who I will go to the wall for if and when. Even though I am an old man, those who would harm my friends or family will definitely be surprised by what I remain capable of, to the regret of their survivors. Yes, big talk, I know. However, although Sipsey Street is only fiction, I firmly believe it will not always be fiction.

If only.

That ignorant, wrong-headed, liberal twit could have saved us all a lot of trouble, a lot of pain and heartache, if she had only used some protection when she spread her legs for whichever black man planted this bad seed.

Low-Life, Classless Slob

The Feral Irishman posted an article concerning Obama's lack of upbringing and lack of class. Of course, having "married" MicHELLe, we all know his taste sucks and he possesses no class whatsoever, but this article comes with a long list of photos showing this clueless imbecile with his feet on the White House furniture, including the Resolute desk in the Oval Office. What a low-life, ignorant bastard. And I mean that literally.

I make no apologies to my less-conservative readers, or anyone wanders onto my site who believes this cretin deserves a nanogram of respect. I hold this in-duh-vidual in the utmost contempt, for his lack of morals, his clueless lack of intelligence (yes, he is clever, but certainly not bright - "even a stopped clock is right twice a day"), his lack of courtesy and proper manners, and especially his desire to destroy the vibrancy of life and liberty that was America. Damn him to Hell.

And as one commenter on the Irishman's post remarked, "I noticed something, no one else has their feet up...... This empty suit of a president makes some ppl on welfare look high class."