The opening graf of the piece, The Savage Lands of islam reads thus: "The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia ruled that ten year old girls can be married off, because in his words, 'Good upbringing makes a girl ready to perform all marital duties at that age.' "
[ I am guessing here that the Grand Mufti is implying that good upbringing means she has already been repeatedly penetrated, probably by a male hand or a foreign object, in order to prepare her to perform her "marital duties". "At that age."]
islamics believe that anything that was good for Mohammed is good for them. Mohammed "married" his most notable wife, Aisha, when she was nine. Before that, he used her sexually without (supposedly) penetrating her, but ejaculating on her clothing. She then was required to go clean it off herself. What a guy. Allah's chosen prophet, don't you know.
The Qu'ran says sexually penetrating a child under nine is not permitted. However, if a muslim does have vaginal (or anal) sex with a child younger than nine, he is required to be responsible for her care for the rest of her life. It doesn't define or describe what "care" involves, though. Does it include feeding her enough to keep her alive? Does it include not continuing to rape her for the rest of her life? Does it mean the other females of the household can't beat her whenever they wish?
Of course, the rest of her life doesn't need to be measured in years. Or even months or weeks. You could do as this holy man, this imam did to his 5 year old daughter:
"In response, the Sheikh inflicted the following
upon his child:
A broken back.
Raped multiple times.
A crushed skull.
Numerous burns throughout her
body.
A broken left arm.
Multiple broken ribs.
Al-Ghamdi also admitted in court to using a cane
as well as electric cables in the torture/rape of
his child. Hospital social worker Randa al-Kaleeb
stated the child had been raped "everywhere."
The little girl managed to linger for ten months
before finally succumbing to her injuries."She didn't even make it to nine years old, when she would have been legal to rape as many times as he wished. This "holy man", this vile creature was allowed to be freed from prison because he came up with some cash to pay off the mother of their child. Shariah allows for "blood money" paid to the mother as full recompense for the crime of raping, torturing, and beating a five year old little girl so badly that she eventually succumbed to her injuries and died.
Where are the feminists, the soccer moms, the liberal/progressive/Democrat women, the Pelosis, the Boxers, the Feinsteins who rant about "If it saves just one child!"? Where are these hypocritical bitches who claim to care? Why isn't that bitch Moochelle shown holding up a hashtag card for this horribly abused child, pretending concern as she pretended to care about the girls kidnapped and enslaved by Boko Haram (whose official name - Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'Awati Wal-Jihad - means People Committed to the Prophet's Teachings for Propagation and Jihad).
So, this imam - "the man who leads prayers in a mosque", a "learned and holy man" according to the cult of islam - goes free, when he should instead have been tortured himself, repeatedly raped and beaten, for the rest of his life, extended as long as possible. At the very least, he should have had his spinal cord severed around T-5 or T-6, making him a paraplegic for the rest of his life. Or perhaps C-4, making him quadraplegic, although some other muslim would have probably given him a too-merciful death in that case.
Yet the Left believes that islam is a religion. A religion of peace. They believe that muslims deserve better treatment than Christians who "cling to their bibles and their guns".
I won't get into the whole topic of how muslims, islam, the Qu'ran treat women. The beating, the stoning, the beheading, the genital mutilation of infants, girls, and older females. I won't even get into the sura which deal with how it is permitted to have sex with animals, as long as you don't eat them or sell them as food afterwards. Oh, excuse me - you can sell them as food, just not in your own town or village. (It doesn't say you have to clean them up first, either.) And I won't repeat my earlier posts about how it is acceptable for muslim men to have sex (rape, too) with "beardless boys" (bacha bereesh - boys who haven't reached puberty), whether they are willing or not?
Isn't anyone on the Left capable of outrage at these evil creatures who claim their "religion" allows them to rape and otherwise abuse children? islam is a perverted death cult, and its followers are less than animals. They are definitely sub-human, and islam should either be erased from the face of the Earth or, at the very least, quarantined on an island with no possibility of leaving that island, ever. islam is a scourge, an excrescence upon the human race.
Don't be so foolish as to try to say it is only "extremist" muslims, "radical" muslims, who believe these things and act upon them. In reality - reality being something the Left intentionally ignores - there is only orthodox islam, and the Qu'ran, its unholy Book, tells muslims they must kill, rape, stone, behead and abuse children, women, and men. Especially those who claim to be muslim but do not hate, kill, rape, stone, behead and abuse like the real, true followers of Mohammed do.
One of these days I will tell you how I really feel about islam and muslims.
