Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.
~ Thomas Jefferson

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

The Qu'ran - a primer on child molestation, bestiality, and killing women and female children

I am going to reiterate some things that I have written about in the past, but which truly do bear repeating. I'm moved to do this after reading a recent post by Daniel Greenfield at his blog Sultan Knish.

The opening graf of the piece, The Savage Lands of islam reads thus:  "The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia ruled that ten year old girls can be married off, because in his words, 'Good upbringing makes a girl ready to perform all marital duties at that age.' "
[ I am guessing here that the Grand Mufti is implying that good upbringing means she has already been repeatedly penetrated, probably by a male hand or a foreign object, in order to prepare her to perform her "marital duties". "At that age."]

islamics believe that anything that was good for Mohammed is good for them. Mohammed "married" his most notable wife, Aisha, when she was nine. Before that, he used her sexually without (supposedly) penetrating her, but ejaculating on her clothing. She then was required to go clean it off herself. What a guy. Allah's chosen prophet, don't you know.

The Qu'ran says sexually penetrating a child under nine is not permitted. However, if a muslim does have vaginal (or anal) sex with a child younger than nine, he is required to be responsible for her care for the rest of her life. It doesn't define or describe what "care" involves, though. Does it include feeding her enough to keep her alive? Does it include not continuing to rape her for the rest of her life? Does it mean the other females of the household can't beat her whenever they wish?

Of course, the rest of her life doesn't need to be measured in years. Or even months or weeks. You could do as this holy man, this imam did to his 5 year old daughter:

"In response, the Sheikh inflicted the following
upon his child:
A broken back.
Raped multiple times.
A crushed skull.
Numerous burns throughout her
A broken left arm.
Multiple broken ribs.

Al-Ghamdi also admitted in court to using a cane
as well as electric cables in the torture/rape of
his child. Hospital social worker Randa al-Kaleeb
stated the child had been raped "everywhere."
The little girl managed to linger for ten months
before finally succumbing to her injuries."

She didn't even make it to nine years old, when she would have been legal to rape as many times as he wished. This "holy man", this vile creature was allowed to be freed from prison because he came up with some cash to pay off the mother of their child. Shariah allows for "blood money" paid to the mother as full recompense for the crime of raping, torturing, and beating a five year old little girl so badly that she eventually succumbed to her injuries and died.

Where are the feminists, the soccer moms, the liberal/progressive/Democrat women, the Pelosis, the Boxers, the Feinsteins who rant about "If it saves just one child!"? Where are these hypocritical bitches who claim to care? Why isn't that bitch Moochelle shown holding up a hashtag card for this horribly abused child, pretending concern as she pretended to care about the girls kidnapped and enslaved by Boko Haram (whose official name - Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'Awati Wal-Jihad - means People Committed to the Prophet's Teachings for Propagation and Jihad). 

So, this imam - "the man who leads prayers in a mosque", a "learned and holy man" according to the cult of islam - goes free, when he should instead have been tortured himself, repeatedly raped and beaten, for the rest of his life, extended as long as possible. At the very least, he should have had his spinal cord severed around T-5 or T-6, making him a paraplegic for the rest of his life. Or perhaps C-4, making him quadraplegic, although some other muslim would have probably given him a too-merciful death in that case.

Yet the Left believes that islam is a religion. A religion of peace. They believe that muslims deserve better treatment than Christians who "cling to their bibles and their guns". 

I won't get into the whole topic of how muslims, islam, the Qu'ran treat women. The beating, the stoning, the beheading, the genital mutilation of infants, girls, and older females. I won't even get into the sura which deal with how it is permitted to have sex with animals, as long as you don't eat them or sell them as food afterwards. Oh, excuse me - you can sell them as food, just not in your own town or village. (It doesn't say you have to clean them up first, either.) And I won't repeat my earlier posts about how it is acceptable for muslim men to have sex (rape, too) with "beardless boys" (bacha bereesh - boys who haven't reached puberty), whether they are willing or not?

Isn't anyone on the Left capable of outrage at these evil creatures who claim their "religion" allows them to rape and otherwise abuse children? islam is a perverted death cult, and its followers are less than animals. They are definitely sub-human, and islam should either be erased from the face of the Earth or, at the very least, quarantined on an island with no possibility of leaving that island, ever. islam is a scourge, an excrescence upon the human race.

Don't be so foolish as to try to say it is only "extremist" muslims, "radical" muslims, who believe these things and act upon them. In reality - reality being something the Left intentionally ignores - there is only orthodox islam, and the Qu'ran, its unholy Book, tells muslims they must kill, rape, stone, behead and abuse children, women, and men. Especially those who claim to be muslim but do not hate, kill, rape, stone, behead and abuse like the real, true followers of Mohammed do.

One of these days I will tell you how I really feel about islam and muslims. 

Saturday, October 11, 2014

I've been derelict in keeping up with this blog. My wife and I have been struggling with the increasing physical limitations inherent in our respective ages, along with the need to deal with various issues that demand so much of our energies that we must set aside some of our other interests and activities.

Recently, we have had a problem with skunks killing our chickens. We raise Buff Orpingtons, primarily for eggs, although they will become food if things ever get to the point where a trip to the supermarket is no longer an option. We've lost three hens (out of seven) to two skunks, which I ended up killing when I was unable to trap them. We had spent several days working on making it more difficult for skunks to burrow into our hen house, burying chicken wire along the entire perimeter, then covering it with rock and pieces of firewood we had available. That proved successful in stopping the immediate loss of more hens, but there was at least one more skunk trying to get into the hen house.

When that third skunk demonstrated the ability to escape the snare I set for him, I purchased some live traps, baiting them with scraps of cooked chicken and chicken bones (from store-bought chicken). The very first night, the trap was sprung. The next morning I released our Maine Coon cat, who - in spite of being very well fed and plied with daily treats - was meowing piteously from inside the larger of the two traps.

It took three more nights, but finally the third skunk was caught. He was dispatched at close range while still in the trap, the thinking being that a quick demise would prevent the release of his musk. Au contraire - he emitted the worse spraying of any skunk I have ever killed. Opening the front door ever so briefly was enough to contaminate the entire house with the acrid odor of skunk musk.

Hosing down the deck and the area around the trap (which was under the deck near our front door) didn't help. I mixed up a batch of musk de-activator - 32 ounces of hydrogen peroxide, 8 ounces of baking soda, and several drops of liquid dish detergent (a surfactant helping to spread the mixture) - and  spraying that from a bottle onto the deck and the dead skunk itself seemed to help. We've used that successfully when we have had dogs which have gotten sprayed by a skunk, and it was useful in this situation as well. We are now waiting to see if there is yet another skunk (or more) nearby, or if we have solved our problem for the time being.

Next adventure: discovering a burned-out element in our electric water heater, I attempted to drain the tank in order to replace the element. Unfortunately, our water is very hard, and the prior owner had never maintained the system. The tank wouldn't drain, because there was over six inches of scale (mineral deposits) in the bottom of the tank. After trying to blow the scale away from the inside of the drain valve with an air compressor, I was finally able to get the water to drain slowly. About six hours later, it was close enough to empty that I was able to remove the defective element. I then used a wet/dry shop vacuum to clean out the scale. About seven or eight pounds of it. I then flushed the tank several times more, finally installing the new 4500 watt element. After re-filling the tank, and bleeding the pipes to make sure the tank was completely full, I removed the screens and diffusers from the washing machine hoses and the faucets of all the sinks in the house, clearing out the flakes of scale from those locations. Hopefully, we will be good for a few months, when I will drain the tank again to flush the sediment out.

So, political commentary takes a back seat to the necessities of livestock protection and home maintenance.

Friday, September 26, 2014

Testicular cancer

No, not me. Western civilization. Russia may be showing a little more in the way of "cojones" right now than the rest of the West - Europe and America, anyway, but Western Europe has bent over to appease its muslim immigrants and muslim "citizens" (although they don't consider themselves to be citizens of the European countries they live in). America has its trousers at half-mast, but hasn't quite bent over yet, although it is starting to lean forward.

Those of us who have been paying attention know how far "multi-culturalism" has taken over countries like Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, England. It is fairly common knowledge that Geert Wilders, a member of the government of the Netherlands, has been harassed by his own government for "hate speech" for the truths - most of them easily proven to be factual - he has spoken concerning islam. However, as much as I despise the governments of Scandinavia and Middle Europe for their coddling of muslims, the most craven, cowardly, disgusting government is that of the United Kingdom.

Where the other governments of Europe are suffering from the cancer, England has not only had a bi-lateral orchiectomy (surgical removal of those two little organs), but the cancer has spread to every part of the "body politic".

Not too long ago, a local politician gave a speech at a street rally in which he related a quote of something said by Winston Churchill concerning islam and muslims. [You probably have noticed I refuse to capitalize the word - it is because I refuse to show any respect for the cult of islam] This politician was arrested, because his voicing of that quotation was deemed likely to "incite" the local muslims. So, obviously, Europe has a problem with free speech. Oh, wait - I misspoke. Free speech is permitted, but only if it is done by muslims. They can speak of killing infidels, of beheading non-believers, of wiping Israel from the face of the earth, of destroying America, the "Great Satan". They can curse the very British government which provides free housing and billions (that is not an exaggeration) of pounds of money and other assistance to muslim immigrants, without fear of reprisal. So, no free speech for the countries' own citizens ("subjects" in the case of the UK), but complete freedom of expression for muslims.

That is not the worst of it. As Paul Harvey used to say, here's the rest of the story.

Recently, it became public knowledge that the borough of Rotherham in the UK had experienced well over 1400 cases of rape, gang-rape, forced prostitution, forced drug addiction for the purpose of sexual abuse and forced prostitution, grooming for prostitution and sexual abuse (the only distinction being whether the sex was paid for or provided as a "courtesy" to friends or acquaintances), as well as beatings, being doused with gasoline and threatened with death. The victims were all young, female, and British non-muslim. It is believed that the number of girls victimized may actually be more than double that figure. One young victim verbally confronted one the muslims who "groomed" her for sexual abuse when she saw him on the street, and was violently arrested by the very police who looked the other way when the muslims used her.

One thing that stands out like a neon sign is the fact that the British media refuses to identify these scumwads as muslim. The papers all call them "Asian". None of the names you read are Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Thai, Filipino, or even Malaysian. They are all Middle Eastern, and the scum involved are all muslim. In much of the UK, they are predominantly Pakistani, as I believe were most of the Rotherham animals involved.

I know that a number of parents did actually try to get the police - and the city council - to do something during the 16 years this was known to be going on, but nothing was done because the perpetrators were muslims. I must say I just can't understand how this continued so long without at least _some_ of the fathers killing some of the muslims involved. Yes, I understand that the British are sheep, that they permit their government to do things that should have ended when the Magna Carta was signed (although we are catching up with them in that sense, since our government has been ignoring the Constitution for many years, especially since Wilson and FDR, but even more so since the Obamination took office). I also know that a number of the young girls victimized were children of single mothers, some of whom were drug addicts and not even available as a parent to the girls.

Nonetheless, had this happened in some parts of America (notably the South, and parts of the West) I feel certain a torch-light parade of fathers, brothers, and concerned citizens would have piled Pakistani bodies on the outskirts of town soon after it was discovered to be going on, not simply protesting it verbally for sixteen years.

Oslo, Norway has been trying to conceal for some time the fact that 100% (again, not an exaggeration) of the rapes occurring in their city have been perpetrated by muslim males. Yet, even that pales against a town that would look the other way while thousands of young girls were raped, gang-raped and otherwise victimized by muslim scum. But - don't for a minute think that this hasn't been happening in other towns and cities in England, as well.

I hope someday that islam will be recognized as a cancer on the face of the earth, and that the death cult will be eradicated, perhaps beginning with the destruction of the islamic shrines in Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem (a place that Mohammed never actually visited). It should be done, not simply because of the damage to so many muslim children and women, the damage to innocent citizens in Israel, and in various other countries around the world, but because the beliefs and behaviors of the cult are so vile, with no redeeming value whatsoever.

Any muslims - or wanna-be muslims, muslim apologists, or other fellow travelers - who wish to visit me to dispute the issue, feel free to contact me. I would be perfectly happy to provide explicit directions to where I live. Just keep in mind that this is rural, mountainous country, and I have three or four sturdy shovels close at hand.

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Resurrection - and my usual diatribe

I have been away from this blog for some time, now. The biggest issue was having moved to a location where I did not have Internet access. Driving ten (or thirty) miles to a public library was not conducive to maintaining this blog, even if I had composed most of my posts off-line. However, I now have satellite access.

I debated whether or not to perform CPR on STL (Slogging Toward Liberty), as there simply isn't anything I can do to help return this country to anything approaching a condition of liberty. At least, not within the system as it exists. However, I did come up with two reasons for starting to post again: First, because it helps me work through some of the thoughts and emotions I experience watching our country swirl down the drain at the hands of an incompetent, mean-spirited, bigoted, race-baiting SOB and his sow of a faux wife, and Second, because I hope that I can open a few eyes to some of what is actually happening to America - and the world - right now. 

This isn't hubris, as I don't have much in the way of answers and I certainly am not bright enough to see the whole picture. Nonetheless, it does not take a rocket scientist to see a lot of what is going on right now is wrong, is damaging to us as a country, as a society, as a civilization and culture. Sure, the progressives would have you believe in "multi-culturalism", that every culture, every society, religion, racial agenda, and sexual deviance (I'm not talking about gays here) is not only acceptable, but is of equal value.

Perhaps that is why NOW and the feminists in our country refuse to speak out against female genital mutilation of infant daughters, wives and sisters by muslims. Why they refuse to speak out against the maiming, the acid-throwing, the cutting off of nose and ears, the stoning to death of girls and women who have displeased their fathers, husbands, brothers, or the local imam. Why they refuse to speak out against the fact that the Qu'ran allows the muslims - encourages them - to feel free to sexually penetrate any female child nine years old or older. Why it permits them to place their penises between the legs of even infants, as long as they don't sexually penetrate them (merely using their tiny bodies to masturbate themselves upon). Why it is acceptable even if they do penetrate the child, as long as they become responsible for that child for the rest of its life. Feeding, clothing, sheltering. Of course, the Qu'ran does not say the food must be healthy or of sufficient quantity. It doesn't say the clothing must be enough to keep the girl child warm. It does not say they can't be "sheltered" in a closet under the stairs. It doesn't say they must be protected from continuing to be raped and abused by any male member of the family, or even male friends of the "husband". Nor does the Qu'ran say the child cannot be beaten daily, routinely, by any member of the family, especially the women of the household, who resent having an additional mouth to feed, clean up after (when she bleeds or becomes sick from sexual abuse and beatings).

Oh, but the progressives will tell you "Islam is a peaceful religion. It is as valuable, no, it is more valuable than Christianity, than Judaism, than any of the other religions of the world." Try to deprive a muslim of a copy of the Qu'ran, or harm a copy of the Qu'ran, and the weight of the government, of the multi-cultural Left (but I repeat myself), will come down upon you. Our children who are raised to be Christian are not permitted to utter a prayer in public, at a sport or other gathering, yet the muslims are permitted to block whole streets in New York City and elsewhere when they decide to kneel in the street and pray to Allah, the "god" who favors the desecration of children and women, who, through his prophet Mohammed, has decreed that infidels must die. Peacefully, I suppose, if by that they mean they must die without resistance.

The ISIS (which the Great Pretender prefers to call the ISIL, as if the word "Levant" gives the group the right to rape and kill in that part of the world), is indeed muslim, is indeed of Islam. Orthodox Islam. The only true Islam. Those fools who speak of "moderate" Islam are ignorant. They do not know, or refuse to admit, that there is only "Islam". Those few who practice (or pretend to practice - we will get into "taqqiya" at a later date) so-called "moderate Islam" are actually disobeying the Qu'ran. They are disobeying the dictates of Allah claimed by his child-raping prophet, Mohammed. They are considered apostates, and the Qu'ran directs every true muslim to kill all apostates, for they are worse than infidels, having been muslims at one point in time, but choosing to deviate from the true path of Islam.

No our buddy B. Hussein O. is only pretending to attack ISIS, accomplishing two goals: looking like he is doing something to stop them, in the hopes of improving the PR of the Democratic Party for the up-coming elections, and at the same time wasting, throwing away, as much of our inventory of Tomahawk missiles and other ordinance as he can without actually harming any of his muslim friends in ISIS or elsewhere. Besides, he is a blood-thirsty little shit, and enjoys watching video of people getting blown up, as he does with many of the drone attacks he has ordered or approved. He enjoys what he feels is the "god-like" power of ordering a Hellfire missile from a drone dropped on the son of a noted (though never proven) American muslim terrorist who had already been killed in an earlier drone strike, as well as other deaths he has caused or approved.

Okay, this is a bit disjointed, even if not quite "stream of consciousness". I don't know how many folks will bother reading a long screed like this, so I'll stop now and continue later. These are issues that are important to me, so I will try to be good about keeping this blog going. I don't know if anyone will read it, as even those few who visited in the past stopped when I stopped writing. I'm hoping a few might return, and that a few new folks might wander by and have cause to consider what I have written. Take care. (Edited 9/26/14) 

Friday, January 11, 2013

Lethal Weapon - your automobile

At the Silicon Graybeard's blog, I learned of a post by Michael Z. Williamson at his blog, The Sacred Cow Slaughterhouse. It was called "We Need to Regulate Cars the Way We Regulate Guns". An excellent transposition of the regulations that apply - or which the Left and the Marxists in the White House and Congress want to soon apply - to firearms, written to apply to automobiles. I probably don't need to add this, but for the cheap seats: it's tongue-in-cheek.

Considering that there are many, many more deaths in cars, by auto accident, drunk drivers, suicide (yes, people do kill themselves in their cars, sometimes killing innocent people along with them), and even the odd homicide with an automobile, it seems logical that the government and all progressive citizens would want much tighter control of cars, perhaps even to ban many of them. They are already registered, so confiscating them in the case of a ban of certain types would be simple. Government "repo", as it were.

Lots of children have been killed, maimed, and injured in motor vehicle accidents, so - let's do it for the children, OK? Who needs a vehicle with more than four cylinders? Who needs a vehicle with a 20 gallon gas tank? Who needs an engine with a 400 cubic inch displacement? Or a turbo or supercharger?
Or an evil-looking spoiler, hood scoop, or air dam? Who needs a Chevy Volt which could burn you to death, or burn your garage and house down?

So, as they say, RTWT. It is well written and quite logical - if you use government and Marxist (but I repeat myself) "logic", that is.

Then, keep in mind that Michael Z. Williamson is also a science fiction author of a number of extremely well-written (and entertaining) books. Then tend toward the libertarian side of the debate, but he presents it in a painless and enjoyable fashion that you will find difficult to put down, if you enjoy science fiction. You can find them at your local library, or here:  http://www.baenebooks.com/s-112-michael-z-williamson.aspx

He really is a superb writer. Don't pass him up.

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Hamas recruiting poster

While muslim  men  males who cannot get a woman are willing to use each other for sex, or are willing to die as a suicide bomber because they will then be able to frolic with 72 virgin houri (is that the origin of the word "whore"?), some young muslim men don't want to choose either of those options.

These more "discriminating" young men choose to take the path which Mohammed took: pederasty. Also known as pedophilia, sexual interest in children. The above photograph is of a group of young muslims belonging to the terrorist organization known as Hamas. You know them - the organization in political and physical control of Gaza, where the so-called "Palestinians" live. At least until the U.N. is able to force the Israelis off of the little land that remains to them in the Middle East.

So, instead of having sex with each other (or perhaps, in addition to that), they are allowed to marry child brides. Oh, come on. You didn't think that was a photo of a bunch of muslim older brothers taking their little sisters to their First Communion, did you? Or did you imagine they were taking their dates to a Jon Benet Ramsey Look-Alike contest?

Daniel Greenfield, of Sultan Knish blogging fame, wrote an article called "Islam Was Born Out Of Child Abuse And Rape". In it, he relates, so accurately,

"Islam was not only born out of the rape of Aisha, but out of the rape and slavery of countless women captured by Mohammed's forces. The rape and abuse of those women was a recruitment tool for Islam. While muslims who fight to conquer and subjugate non-muslims are promised 72 virginal demon women in paradise, for many of the more practically minded, that was not enough incentive. They wanted their reward now. Mohammed's forces looted the property of those they conquered and subjugated. But they also kidnapped and sexually abused their wives and daughters."

Read the whole article. As I have tried to do in previous posts, it gives you a glimpse of the real Islam. Orthodox Islam, where child rape, infant rape, the killing of young girls, daughters, wives and rape victims is a point of "honor" for the scum who are orthodox muslim males. Males who truly believe that  "women are for making sons. Beardless boys (bacha bereesh) are for pleasure." Although they certainly aren't above using female children instead. Islam, where a muslim male is permitted to place his penis between the thighs of a child - even an infant - as long as he does not penetrate her (or him).

Yes, I know this is crude and disgusting. So is believing that Islam is anything other than a disgusting and perverted death cult.  The notion of "Coexisting" with Islam is sick and disgusting. And stupid, since Islam absolutely refuses to coexist with any other religion, culture, or political system. They will pretend to do so just until they are in a position to subjugate the rest of us, the way they subjugate their women, children, and each other, but their very Qur'an and Hadith explain that the Universal Caliphate is their ultimate goal, where you either submit (the literal translation of the word "Islam" is "submission"), become a slave ("dhimmitude"), or you die.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Gun confiscation-how it may go down

I just finished listening to a police officer from Missouri talking about how he envisioned the government implementing gun confiscation, secondary to whatever new laws may come out of D.C. He said that he thought it would not happen in a door-to-door search as it did in New Orleans after Katrina. He said he believed it would happen either by vehicle checkpoints or by warrants issued in your specific name.

Let's think about this for a moment. In Texas, they are already doing checkpoints, supposedly to locate and identify gang members. They stop them, check ID, photograph gang "tats", and maybe even arrest any they find who have active warrants. In the Southern border states, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California, Border Patrol ("ICE", now) has checkpoints set up as much as 100+ miles north of the border, supposedly checking for illegals, but also for anything else they are interested in. Usually, they stop you and check your ID, whether you look like a blond-haired, blue-eyed Scandanavian or a seven-foot tall Watusi, although I have been waved through without a check on several occasions (years ago - I don't know if anyone is getting waved through these days).

There are many reasons for checkpoints, but in the future they may have one more purpose.

If registration of any and all firearms is ordered via legislation, each and ever one of us who has ever purchased a firearm through a store where a BATFE form 4473 has been filled out will be in a law enforcement database. It may be a statewide database or a Federal one. BATFE may give access to their database to state and local agencies, or fusion centers which can be accessed by those agencies. Any agency which is given access will be able to see if you have purchased a firearm where a 4473 was filled out. More than likely, that access will be tied into your state's motor vehicle system, or BATFE may simply have their IT staff enter your vehicle data into their own database. Some of us know this happens already in our state when we get a CHL/CCW permit. I have been stopped for speeding and asked if I was currently carrying a firearm, due to the state tying the CHL database into the DMV database.

So. It is several weeks after the deadline has passed for you to either register (what you are "allowed" to keep) or turn in your firearms (the ones they banned). If you are stopped in any kind of checkpoint, you are likely to have your plates and/or driver's license run for "weapons registered to" you. If your local/state agency has decided to assist the Feds in their confiscation and enforcement of the new laws, you go to jail. Right there, right now. Your family and friends may never know, especially if the Feds, fusion center, or local agency has been directed to hold you "incommunicado" - without allowing you to make phone calls or otherwise notify anyone. The Patriot Act and NDAA allow them to get away with that, as you probably already know.

The agency then - with or without a warrant - goes to your home, throws your wife against a wall, points an MP5 or MP7 at your kids, shoots your dog and stomps your cat, then tears your house apart looking for your guns, ammo, stored food, "subversive" literature, computers with the email addresses of fellow patriots, and anything else they want.

Even without the checkpoints, if your local agency decides to comply with the Federal efforts at confiscation and detention of us "domestic terrorists", it could be as simple as the Feds providing a blanket warrant for anyone who ever filled out a Form 4473. Guilty until proven innocent. You drive into town to get some milk, or feed for the chickens, or to pick up medicine at Walgreens or CVS for your child, and some local cop runs your plate when you drive by. He gets a hit, pulls you over, IDs you as having a warrant for unregistered firearms, and hooks you up. Once they have you in custody, they know they have an excellent chance of getting into your house without getting shot (unless your wife is a tigress willing to die rather than be a slave, or willing to fight to keep your kids from being placed with some child molester via CPS. Yes, then she has to didi-mau out of there with the kids, but that is a whole separate article in itself).

Otherwise, other cops or Feds go to your home, jack your wife and kids up, kill your pets, ransack your house, steal your guns, food, supplies, cash, silver and gold, and take off. Your door hanging from its hinges, your gun safe torched open, your pets bleeding on the floor or ground, your wife in cuffs and your children hauled off to Child "Protective" Services - probably to end up in the foster care of that pederast I mentioned.

I think this is more likely than any cops - especially cowardly faggot Federal officers - risking their lives going door-to-door, don't you? Do you see how easy it could be?

Hopefully, the word would get out, and patriots would then simply refuse to stop for a traffic stop. Those of us who could might simply not leave their homes, except perhaps after dark, or only in an emergency, like getting medicine for a loved one, or taking them to a hospital (or perhaps a trusted family doctor).

Once we heard it was happening, it would be time to start taking down any checkpoints you knew or heard about. It would be time to go to local law enforcement facilities and destroy their vehicles and infrastructure (that way avoiding killing any good cops, or at least without angering the LEOs so much they make a career of hunting you down). Initially, however, some people are going to get hammered, then crushed.

So. Before any new gun control legislation goes through, each and every one of us needs to set up comms with friends and family, so that if one of you is taken or targeted, the rest learn about it as soon as possible. Look for, expect something like this to happen. I hope to Christ (forgive my blasphemy if you are religious) that I am simply being paranoid, but this is how I see it playing out. If you have any ideas to add to this, or can point out - logically, not merely wishful thinking - where you think I am wrong, please do so. Semper paratus, my friends.