Friday, January 11, 2013
At the Silicon Graybeard's blog, I learned of a post by Michael Z. Williamson at his blog, The Sacred Cow Slaughterhouse. It was called "We Need to Regulate Cars the Way We Regulate Guns". An excellent transposition of the regulations that apply - or which the Left and the Marxists in the White House and Congress want to soon apply - to firearms, written to apply to automobiles. I probably don't need to add this, but for the cheap seats: it's tongue-in-cheek.
Considering that there are many, many more deaths in cars, by auto accident, drunk drivers, suicide (yes, people do kill themselves in their cars, sometimes killing innocent people along with them), and even the odd homicide with an automobile, it seems logical that the government and all progressive citizens would want much tighter control of cars, perhaps even to ban many of them. They are already registered, so confiscating them in the case of a ban of certain types would be simple. Government "repo", as it were.
Lots of children have been killed, maimed, and injured in motor vehicle accidents, so - let's do it for the children, OK? Who needs a vehicle with more than four cylinders? Who needs a vehicle with a 20 gallon gas tank? Who needs an engine with a 400 cubic inch displacement? Or a turbo or supercharger?
Or an evil-looking spoiler, hood scoop, or air dam? Who needs a Chevy Volt which could burn you to death, or burn your garage and house down?
So, as they say, RTWT. It is well written and quite logical - if you use government and Marxist (but I repeat myself) "logic", that is.
Then, keep in mind that Michael Z. Williamson is also a science fiction author of a number of extremely well-written (and entertaining) books. Then tend toward the libertarian side of the debate, but he presents it in a painless and enjoyable fashion that you will find difficult to put down, if you enjoy science fiction. You can find them at your local library, or here: http://www.baenebooks.com/s-112-michael-z-williamson.aspx
He really is a superb writer. Don't pass him up.
Saturday, January 5, 2013
These more "discriminating" young men choose to take the path which Mohammed took: pederasty.
[Edit: this is incorrect. Pederasty applies to adult males and young boys alone, while pedophilia covers both genders, both ways - and yes, Virginia, there are only two.]
Also known as pedophilia, sexual interest in children. The above photograph is of a group of young muslims belonging to the terrorist organization known as Hamas. You know them - the organization in political and physical control of Gaza, where the so-called "Palestinians" live. At least until the U.N. is able to force the Israelis off of the little land that remains to them in the Middle East.
So, instead of having sex with each other (or perhaps, in addition to that), they are allowed to marry child brides. Oh, come on. You didn't think that was a photo of a bunch of muslim older brothers taking their little sisters to their First Communion, did you? Or did you imagine they were taking their dates to a Jon Benet Ramsey Look-Alike contest?
Daniel Greenfield, of Sultan Knish blogging fame, wrote an article called "Islam Was Born Out Of Child Abuse And Rape". In it, he relates, so accurately,
"Islam was not only born out of the rape of Aisha, but out of the rape and slavery of countless women captured by Mohammed's forces. The rape and abuse of those women was a recruitment tool for Islam. While muslims who fight to conquer and subjugate non-muslims are promised 72 virginal demon women in paradise, for many of the more practically minded, that was not enough incentive. They wanted their reward now. Mohammed's forces looted the property of those they conquered and subjugated. But they also kidnapped and sexually abused their wives and daughters."
Read the whole article. As I have tried to do in previous posts, it gives you a glimpse of the real Islam. Orthodox Islam, where child rape, infant rape, the killing of young girls, daughters, wives and rape victims is a point of "honor" for the scum who are orthodox muslim males. Males who truly believe that "women are for making sons. Beardless boys (bacha bereesh) are for pleasure." Although they certainly aren't above using female children instead. Islam, where a muslim male is permitted to place his penis between the thighs of a child - even an infant - as long as he does not penetrate her (or him).
Yes, I know this is crude and disgusting. So is believing that Islam is anything other than a disgusting and perverted death cult. The notion of "Coexisting" with Islam is sick and disgusting. And stupid, since Islam absolutely refuses to coexist with any other religion, culture, or political system. They will pretend to do so just until they are in a position to subjugate the rest of us, the way they subjugate their women, children, and each other, but their very Qur'an and Hadith explain that the Universal Caliphate is their ultimate goal, where you either submit (the literal translation of the word "Islam" is "submission"), become a slave ("dhimmitude"), or you die.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
I just finished listening to a police officer from Missouri talking about how he envisioned the government implementing gun confiscation, secondary to whatever new laws may come out of D.C. He said that he thought it would not happen in a door-to-door search as it did in New Orleans after Katrina. He said he believed it would happen either by vehicle checkpoints or by warrants issued in your specific name.
Let's think about this for a moment. In Texas, they are already doing checkpoints, supposedly to locate and identify gang members. They stop them, check ID, photograph gang "tats", and maybe even arrest any they find who have active warrants. In the Southern border states, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California, Border Patrol ("ICE", now) has checkpoints set up as much as 100+ miles north of the border, supposedly checking for illegals, but also for anything else they are interested in. Usually, they stop you and check your ID, whether you look like a blond-haired, blue-eyed Scandanavian or a seven-foot tall Watusi, although I have been waved through without a check on several occasions (years ago - I don't know if anyone is getting waved through these days).
There are many reasons for checkpoints, but in the future they may have one more purpose.
If registration of any and all firearms is ordered via legislation, each and ever one of us who has ever purchased a firearm through a store where a BATFE form 4473 has been filled out will be in a law enforcement database. It may be a statewide database or a Federal one. BATFE may give access to their database to state and local agencies, or fusion centers which can be accessed by those agencies. Any agency which is given access will be able to see if you have purchased a firearm where a 4473 was filled out. More than likely, that access will be tied into your state's motor vehicle system, or BATFE may simply have their IT staff enter your vehicle data into their own database. Some of us know this happens already in our state when we get a CHL/CCW permit. I have been stopped for speeding and asked if I was currently carrying a firearm, due to the state tying the CHL database into the DMV database.
So. It is several weeks after the deadline has passed for you to either register (what you are "allowed" to keep) or turn in your firearms (the ones they banned). If you are stopped in any kind of checkpoint, you are likely to have your plates and/or driver's license run for "weapons registered to" you. If your local/state agency has decided to assist the Feds in their confiscation and enforcement of the new laws, you go to jail. Right there, right now. Your family and friends may never know, especially if the Feds, fusion center, or local agency has been directed to hold you "incommunicado" - without allowing you to make phone calls or otherwise notify anyone. The Patriot Act and NDAA allow them to get away with that, as you probably already know.
The agency then - with or without a warrant - goes to your home, throws your wife against a wall, points an MP5 or MP7 at your kids, shoots your dog and stomps your cat, then tears your house apart looking for your guns, ammo, stored food, "subversive" literature, computers with the email addresses of fellow patriots, and anything else they want.
Even without the checkpoints, if your local agency decides to comply with the Federal efforts at confiscation and detention of us "domestic terrorists", it could be as simple as the Feds providing a blanket warrant for anyone who ever filled out a Form 4473. Guilty until proven innocent. You drive into town to get some milk, or feed for the chickens, or to pick up medicine at Walgreens or CVS for your child, and some local cop runs your plate when you drive by. He gets a hit, pulls you over, IDs you as having a warrant for unregistered firearms, and hooks you up. Once they have you in custody, they know they have an excellent chance of getting into your house without getting shot (unless your wife is a tigress willing to die rather than be a slave, or willing to fight to keep your kids from being placed with some child molester via CPS. Yes, then she has to didi-mau out of there with the kids, but that is a whole separate article in itself).
Otherwise, other cops or Feds go to your home, jack your wife and kids up, kill your pets, ransack your house, steal your guns, food, supplies, cash, silver and gold, and take off. Your door hanging from its hinges, your gun safe torched open, your pets bleeding on the floor or ground, your wife in cuffs and your children hauled off to Child "Protective" Services - probably to end up in the foster care of that pederast I mentioned.
I think this is more likely than any cops - especially cowardly faggot Federal officers - risking their lives going door-to-door, don't you? Do you see how easy it could be?
Hopefully, the word would get out, and patriots would then simply refuse to stop for a traffic stop. Those of us who could might simply not leave their homes, except perhaps after dark, or only in an emergency, like getting medicine for a loved one, or taking them to a hospital (or perhaps a trusted family doctor).
Once we heard it was happening, it would be time to start taking down any checkpoints you knew or heard about. It would be time to go to local law enforcement facilities and destroy their vehicles and infrastructure (that way avoiding killing any good cops, or at least without angering the LEOs so much they make a career of hunting you down). Initially, however, some people are going to get hammered, then crushed.
So. Before any new gun control legislation goes through, each and every one of us needs to set up comms with friends and family, so that if one of you is taken or targeted, the rest learn about it as soon as possible. Look for, expect something like this to happen. I hope to Christ (forgive my blasphemy if you are religious) that I am simply being paranoid, but this is how I see it playing out. If you have any ideas to add to this, or can point out - logically, not merely wishful thinking - where you think I am wrong, please do so. Semper paratus, my friends.