Taqiyya: religious deception

My post on Islam killing for disrespect was commented upon by some blunt tool going by the name of J Smith (John, I presume? What an interesting name for a muslim). This fool attempts to portray Islam as the Religion of Peace. As if we haven't heard this before. I suppose none of the muslim scum in the Middle East who have been blowing each other up, poisoning young school girls, stoning women to death, beating little girls with Down's Syndrome, beheading journalists (well, I guess they're not all bad) ;-), and generally killing and causing mayhem are actually true muslims, according to J Smith.

There is a tenet of Islam which says that deception in the service of Islam is permissible. Lying to protect and promote Islam is not only acceptable, it is encouraged and expected.  From Islam 101 at Jihad Watch we learn:

i. Taqiyya -- Religious Deception

Due to the state of war between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb, reuses de guerre, i.e., systematic lying to the infidel, must be considered part and parcel of Islamic tactics. The parroting by Muslim organizations throughout dar al-harb that "Islam is a religion of peace," or that the origins of Muslim violence lie in the unbalanced psyches of particular individual "fanatics," must be considered as disinformation intended to induce the infidel world to let down its guard. Of course, individual Muslims may genuinely regard their religion as "peaceful" -- but only insofar as they are ignorant of its true teachings, or in the sense of the Egyptian theorist Sayyid Qutb, who posited in his Islam and Universal Peace that true peace would prevail in the world just as soon as Islam had conquered it.

A telling point is that, while Muslims who present their religion as peaceful abound throughout dar al-harb, they are nearly non-existent in dar al-Islam. A Muslim apostate once suggested to me a litmus test for Westerners who believe that Islam is a religion of "peace" and "tolerance": try making that point on a street corner in Ramallah, or Riyadh, or Islamabad, or anywhere in the Muslim world. He assured me you wouldn't live five minutes.

The author goes on to explain that "taqiyya" means "to remain faithful", but that its actual meaning is dissimulation. Just as "Islam" means "peace", but its actual meaning is "submission". Islam means peace through submission, just as taqqiya means to remain faithful through dissimulation, tricking non-believers into believing Islam is peaceful. He then adds:

"Taqiyya" is the religiously-sanctioned doctrine, with its origins in Shi'a Islam but now practiced by non-Shi'a as well, of deliberate dissimulation about religious matters that may be undertaken to protect Islam, and the Believers. A related term, of broader application, is "kitman," which is defined as "mental reservation." An example of "Taqiyya" would be the insistence of a Muslim apologist that "of course" there is freedom of conscience in Islam, and then quoting that Qur'anic verse -- "There shall be no compulsion in religion." {2:256} But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Muslim doctrine of abrogation, or naskh, whereby such an early verse as that about "no compulsion in religion" has been cancelled out by later, far more intolerant and malevolent verses. In any case, history shows that within Islam there is, and always has been, "compulsion in religion" for Muslims, and for non-Muslims.

In times when the greater strength of dar al-harb [the non-muslim world] necessitates that the jihad take an indirect approach, the natural attitude of a Muslim to the infidel world must be one of deception and omission. Revealing frankly the ultimate goal of dar al-Islam [the Islamic world] to conquer and plunder dar al-harb when the latter holds the military trump cards would be strategic idiocy. Fortunately for the jihadists, most infidels do not understand how one is to read the Quran, nor do they trouble themselves to find out what Muhammad actually did and taught, which makes it easy to give the impression through selective quotations and omissions that "Islam is a religion of peace." Any infidel who wants to believe such fiction will happily persist in his mistake having been cited a handful of Meccan verses and told that Muhammad was a man of great piety and charity. Digging only slightly deeper is sufficient to dispel the falsehood.

The Left in America (and throughout Europe, Australia, and the rest of the non-muslim world) would have you believe Islam is "the religion of peace" because it suits them to do so. Promoting and protecting Islam - while vilifying and undermining Christianity (no prayer in public places, no nativity scenes, no displays of the Ten Commandments per the Supreme Court - which displays the Ten Commandments on their own building - nothing that might offend a muslim). These useful fools accept the taqiyya spoken and written by muslims through CAIR and the other organs of the Islamic world (dar al-Islam) without question, because it makes them feel good that they can demonstrate how open and un-bigoted they think themselves to be, how multicultural and worldy they believe themselves to be.

So, when lying SOBs like "J Smith" attempt to get you to believe Islam is the "Religion of Peace", remember that Islam literally translated means "Submission" (to the will of Allah). Remember that the religion of peace is responsible for all of the "suicide" bombers, the beheadings, stonings of women, "honor" killings of young girls and women, the rape of Western women ("pieces of meat" per their imams), the sodomy of young boys ("beardless boys": Bacha Bereesh, boy sex slaves), the sexual penetration of infant girls (whom they must "provide for" for the rest of their lives if they do so, although they are then treated as sex slaves, not wives), and sodomy with animals as well. There is your "religion of peace" - actually a death cult for all but true believers, with sexual slavery and perversion the fate of any female - child or adult woman - as well as young boys and infidels who come under their control.

Don't listen to their lies. Don't accept their deception, their Taqiyya.   

Stevens was alive in this photo

If we weren't already aware of all the things Obama has done to destroy America (in order to turn it into a socialist/Marxist "paradise"), his behavior during and after the Benghazi attack would be reason enough to vote for anyone who stands a chance to defeat him in November.

I didn't watch the last debate, but I am really sorry to learn that Romney did not call Obama on his lies about Benghazi. The world needs to know - America needs to know - that Obama left those men to die when he could have saved them. That they fought in desperation for seven hours, hoping that their own government - aware by phone and drone of the attack upon the consulate - would send help, help that was available and that would definitely have saved their lives. Obama and his advisors, like Valerie Jarrett, willingly, knowingly chose to let them die rather than fight the muslims Obama and Jarrett love.

The only time I have ever known Obama to tell the truth was when he stated, "I will stand with the Muslims should political winds shift in an ugly direction."

Obama would allow muslims to destroy our country rather than act against them. If nothing else could bring you to vote for Romney in the hope that it will depose this vicious, arrogant bastard who hates America, that fact - which he has just demonstrated as clearly as possible - should be sufficient.

Vote Wisely

While walking down the street one day a corrupt Senator (that may be redundant) was tragically hit by a car and died. His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance. "Welcome to heaven," says St.. Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you." "No problem, just let me in," says the Senator. "Well, I'd like to, but I have orders from the higher ups. What we'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity." "Really?, I've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," says the Senator. "I'm sorry, but we have our rules." And with that, St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell. The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a green golf course. In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him. Everyone is very happy and in evening dress. They run to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the people. They played a friendly game of golf and then dine on lobster, caviar and the finest champagne. Also present is the devil, who really is a very friendly guy who is having a good time dancing and telling jokes. They are all having such a good time that before the Senator realizes it, it is time to go. Everyone gives him a hearty farewell and waves while the elevator rises. The elevator goes up, up, up and the door reopens in heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him, "Now it's time to visit heaven..." So, 24 hours passed with the Senator joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. They have a good time and, before he realizes it, the 24 hours have gone by and St. Peter returns. "Well, then, you've spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now choose your eternity." The Senator reflects for a minute, then he answers: "Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off in hell." So St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell... Now the doors of the elevator open and he's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and garbage. He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more trash falls to the ground. The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulders. "I don't understand," stammers the Senator. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time. Now there's just a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?" The devil smiles at him and says, "Yesterday we were campaigning, Today, you voted.." Vote wisely on November 6, 2012

Islam kills for "disrespect"

So, tell me please - are women and little girls considered so cheap, possessing so little value, that they may be killed in the most gruesome fashion merely because a muslim man believes they have caused him to lose respect?

"Toronto mother’s throat slit for letting children adopt Canadian culture, court hears in alleged honor killing trial," by Joe O'Connor in the National Post, October 10

Randjida Khairi was stabbed five times in her chest and back. She had her throat cut, a wound so ugly and deep that it sliced through her neck muscles, voicebox and windpipe — stopping only at her spine.

She was stabbed with two different knives. She drowned in her own blood; a process a pathologist would later determine took between five and 10 minutes. 

Anyone who has visited this blog knows I have written more than once on the evil that is Islam. I have stated before that Islam is not actually a religion, but a cult developed by a sick individual, Mohammed - who created the cult in order to justify his desire to have sex with - to rape, in fact - girls as young as six years old, although it is written that he allowed Aisha to get to the ripe old age of nine before he started raping her. Yes, it was rape. Can you imagine a nine year old girl actually consenting to have full sexual intercourse with an adult male? Even if she was coerced into pretending to be willing, due to cultural and psychological manipulation, indoctrination, does that really change the fact that a nine year old girl doesn't even have the capacity to understand what that involves?

Along with this depraved and disgusting determination that children - including young boys, "beardless boys" - are fair game for sodomy and full penetration, Islam permits muslim men to "thigh" (called "frottage" by the French) an infant. This means rubbing their erect penis against the thighs of an infant until they ejaculate their semen upon the infant. 

Yes, I am digressing here, but I am attempting to demonstrate that there are reasons even short of the killing of women and girls to cause any intelligent person to see that Islam is a cult, not a religion. No matter how badly individuals of other religions have behaved - including priests who also molest children, the Inquisition, the killings during the Crusades, etc. - no other religion makes such behavior acceptable, a part of its religious doctrine. Islam does.

Do you get that? Has it percolated into your consciousness that there is no reason to "COEXIST" with a religion which gives its blessings to this depraved behavior?

Now, let's return to the matter at hand, what is characterized by Islam - and accepted by Western media - as "honor killings". Can you think of any term that is more of an oxymoron that this? Where is the honor in killing defenseless, innocent women and children? If any non-muslim did this, they would be called a monster, have been called a monster, a cause for feeling an immediate and strong revulsion to such an animal.

Done by a muslim, however, the media claims it is a problem of culture, of religion, of Islamic law (Sharia), as if that justifies it, gives it consideration as acceptable behavior simply because it is done in Islamic culture. Hell, it is a religion, so it is protected by the First Amendment, isn't it? Sharia is Islamic law, so we have to respect that, don't we?

When the act is so gruesome, as this killing was, the media goes into a different mode. They then try to distract the public, attempting to deny it is part of a so-called religion, part of the muslim culture. They try to play down any connection to Islam, and pretend it was merely the criminal act of one deranged man.

How is it that our society, our government - local, state, and Federal - can permit this? How is it that they can pretend it is acceptable, and try to make Americans believe it is acceptable, or at the very worst something that must be "discouraged"? If muslim men believe it is necessary to kill their own women and children in response to what they feel is disrespect, how do you think they feel toward us infidels, non-muslim men, women, and children? If they will kill their own without hesitation, do you really think they will refrain from trying to kill us as well? Ask Christopher Stevens, the Ambassador to LIbya what he thinks about that. Oh, wait - he was sodomized and killed by muslims, so I guess you can't ask him.

Those people out there who hate Jews or hate Israel will cheer on the muslims, simply because of the "enemy of my enemy" syndrome. But any intelligent human being (notice I am leaving those people out) is fully capable of understanding that Islam must be eradicated, or - at the very least - cut out, surgically removed from the body of America. Islam is not a religion, and this cult must be removed from within our country. Let them practice this death cult, this perversion of child molestation and killing, elsewhere but not in America. It is my belief we will be faced with fighting it even then, but it would at least keep America a bit safer from their jihad taking place within our ranks, as happened with Maj. Nidal Hassan, the muslim fanatic who killed our soldiers at Fort Hood.

Folks, Islam is a disease. It is a cancer of the mind and soul which must be eradicated. Doing anything else is simply the same as knowing you have a tumor and ignoring it, allowing it to spread until it kills you. I wish I could make people understand this. Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer are trying to make the world understand this, but the Left - all around the world, not simply in America - refuses to admit this. They are doing their best to force us to accept it under the guise of "multiculturalism", claiming that we must respect it because it is the proper culture of those who follow Islam, which they pretend is a true religion rather than the cult it actually is. It is time to face the facts and rid ourselves of this death cult.

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Presidents, that is

A friend (and relative by marriage) just sent me an email that addresses some opinions voiced by former Secret Service agents about our Presidents, going back as far as John F. Kennedy. It is instructive, and quite believable.

  Subject: Think you know the Presidents?

If you want to know what a rich man is like, ask his servants….. If you want to know what a President is like, check with the Secret Service (after their retirement)   Here are snippets from a book of "Impressions & Observations" of Secret Service personnel assigned to guard U.S. Presidents/First Ladies, and Vice Presidents.   JOHN & JACQUELINE KENNEDY   *A philanderer of the highest order. * *She ordered the kitchen help to save all the left-over wine during State dinner, mixed with fresh wine and served again during the next White House occasion.*   *LYNDON & LADYBIRD JOHNSON  *Another philanderer of the highest order. In addition, LBJ was as crude as the day is long. Both JFK and LBJ kept a lot of women in the White House for extramarital affairs, and both had set up "early warning systems" to alert them if/when their wives were nearby. Both Kennedy & Johnson were promiscuous and oversexed men. * *She was either naive or just pretended to "not know" about her husband's many liaisons. *   *RICHARD & PAT NIXON  *A "moral" man but very odd, weird, paranoid, etc. He had horrible relationship with his family, and in a way, was almost a recluse.* *She was quiet most of the time.*   *SPIRO AGNEW * Nice, decent man, everyone in the Secret Service was surprised about his downfall. *   *GERALD & BETTY FORD  *A true gentlemen who treated the Secret Service with respect and dignity. He had a great sense of humor. * *She drank a lot!*   *JIMMY & ROSALYN CARTER  *A complete phony who would portray one picture of himself to public and very different in private, e..g., would be shown carrying his own luggage, but the suit cases were always empty; he kept empty ones just for photo op's. Wanted the people to see him as pious and a non-drinker, but he and his family drank alcohol a lot. He had disdain for the Secret Service, and was very irresponsible with the "football" nuclear codes. He didn't think it was a big deal and would keep military aides at a great distance. Often did not acknowledge the presence of Secret Service personnel assigned to serve him.* *She mostly did her own thing.*   *RONALD & NANCY REAGAN *The real deal --- moral, honest, respectful, and dignified. They treated Secret Service and everyone else with respect and honor. Thanked everyone all the time. He took the time to know everyone on a personal level. * One "favorite" story which has circulated among the Secret Service personnel was an incident early in his Presidency, when he came out of his room with a pistol tucked on his hip. The agent in charge asked: "Why the pistol, Mr. President" He replied, "In case you boys can't get the job done, I can help." It was common for him to carry a pistol. When he met with Gorbachev, he had a pistol in his briefcase. Upon learning that Gary Hart was caught with Donna Rice, Reagan said, "Boys will be boys, but boys will not be Presidents." [He obviously either did not know or forgot JFK's and LBJ's sexcapades!]* *She was very nice but very protective of the President; and the Secret Service was often caught in the middle. She tried hard to control what the President ate, and he would say to the agent "Come on, you gotta help me out." The Reagans drank wine during State dinners and special occasions only; otherwise, they shunned alcohol; the Secret Service could count on one hand the times they were served wine during their "family dinner". For all the fake bluster of the Carters, the Reagans were the ones who lived life as genuinely moral people.*   *GEORGE H. & BARBARA BUSH  *Extremely kind and considerate Always respectful. Took great care in making sure the agents' comforts were taken care of. They even brought them meals, etc. One time Barbara Bush brought warm clothes to agents standing outside at Kennebunkport; one agent was given a warm hat, and when he tried to nicely say "no thanks" even though he was obviously freezing, President Bush said "Son, don't argue with the First Lady, put the hat on." He was the most prompt of the Presidents. He ran the White House like a well-oiled machine.* *She ruled the house and spoke her mind.*   *BILL & HILLARY CLINTON *Presidency was one giant party. Not trustworthy --- he was nice because he wanted everyone to like him, but to him life is just one big game and party. Everyone knows of his sexuality.* *She is another phony. Her personality would change the instant cameras were near. She hated with open disdain the military and Secret Service. She was another one who felt people are there to serve her. She was always trying to keep tabs on Bill Clinton.*   *ALBERT GORE * An egotistical ass, who was once overheard by his Secret Service detail lecturing his only son that he needed to do better in school or he "would end up like these guys" --- pointing to the agents.*   *GEORGE W. & LAURA BUSH *The Secret Service loved him and Laura Bush. He was also the most physically "in shape" who had a very strict workout regimen. The Bushes made sure their entire administrative and household staff understood to respect and be considerate of the Secret Service. *She was one of the nicest First Ladies, if not the nicest; she never had any harsh word to say about anyone.* *KARL ROVE was the one who was the most caring of the Secret Service in the administration.*   *BARACK & MICHELLE OBAMA *" Clinton all over again" - hates the military and looks down on the Secret Service. He is egotistical and cunning; looks you in the eye and appears to agree with you, but turns around and does the opposite---untrustworthy. He has temper tantrums.* *She is a complete witch, who hates anybody who is not black; hates the military; and looks at the Secret Service as servants.*