Who will be Biden's V.P., and how was she chosen?

My friend Bill Doyle and I have believed for some time that Hillary will be "chosen" by Biden as his VP. I've been giving it a lot of thought, and I'm having second (and third) thoughts.  I think it might be Michelle Obama, instead. First, she is not under a cloud of multiple felony crimes as Hillary is. No, Hillary will never be charged, let alone tried, for even the felonies she has _admitted_ being guilty of committing. But many people may still understand she is a criminal - just an "undocumented" criminal.

Another reason is that - in my opinion only - her sociopathic personality and extreme anger when things don't go her way would make her less controllable by those who operate (like a marionette) the various Democrat leaders, such as Barack Hussein. Given the power of the presidency, even those in control might fear finding their names on her "List". I'm not sure she _could_ be controlled, and the PTB may feel the same way.

It could be claimed by the DNC that Michelle is far more popular, that she would win the bipartisan black vote, the bipartisan "female" vote, the total Democrat vote, and even the vote of  non-Democrat white male virtue-signalers. So, if all the Democrat election fraud by mail-in vote, hacked voting machines, vote harvesting, illegal alien votes, multiple voting by Democrat voters, and other methods were in actuality overcome by the real votes of the majority of legal American voters choosing Trump, they could still manipulate the vote _count_ itself, and claim she won due to her "widespread bipartisan popularity". That would be a far easier sell than it would be for Hillary. (DNC ad for Biden VP: "No hags need apply").

Think about this, and point out where I am wrong. Please. I think Hillary might still be easier to beat, so seeing Michelle made VP by the DNC could be a very bad thing.

How the DNC disenfranchised Democrat voters

Has anyone come to the same conclusion that I have on the whole Democrat candidate for President farce? On why they have been running a demonstrably mentally "disadvantaged" candidate for President? How they can even imagine that running him would be good for the country (which they obviously DON'T care about)? The DNC may have been throwing nominees at the wall by the bushel, looking to see who might stick, but - as we saw in 2016 and again now - the DNC is who actually chooses the candidate, NOT the voters.

Don't get me wrong, the Republicans do it, too. Ron Paul was very popular when running against Obama, too popular for the establishment Republicans, the RNC and influencers hired by them (and the bankers, especially with his determination to "audit the Federal Reserve"). So the Republicans refused to count most of his votes, and he eventually dropped out, in spite of receiving far more donations, far more money than McCain. He either figured out, and/or was actually told, that he would "never be the man".

We saw it happen again this year, with Bernie. Oh, they let him run with the rest of the Democrat Rat Pack, but it was a forgone conclusion that he would be bought off (was given a very nice house last time) once again. Still a downer for him, but I'm sure it was explained very well that he would step down, and why.

So, this time they are bypassing the Democrat voters altogether. Yes, all of the primaries were a farce, a sham, as the DNC knew it would be running a man suffering from dementia. That way _they_ can pick who they truly want in office by picking the VP. If their voter fraud mojo is strong enough (they will go all-out this time, not making the mistake they made with Hillary, thinking they had it in the bag), they will inaugurate him, and then sadly use the 25th Amendment to remove him from office (Hillary would probably have just "tagged" him), making _their_ choice for President the new President.

Pick this apart if you can, but it makes sense to me that this is what we are seeing here, in slow motion.

The Western Journal Kneels for BLM

I just attempted to comment on a Western Journal article written by Michael Austin, a bright and articulate young man. He wrote about an entire "pro" sports team (I guess fast-pitch softball is a pro sport these days) of young women (can't say ladies) who called it "reverse racism" when their manager made a positive comment about President Trump. My comment was:

"Good article, Mr. Austin. These fools getting butt-hurt because they believe the lies spread by Kaepernick, BLM, Antifa, and the scum Democrats in Congress led by Pelosi, simply prove how low their IQ is, how ignorant they are, and how easily they are manipulated and used by the Left/Democrats. Fortunately, more and more blacks such as Candace Owens and numerous other black conservatives are awakening black citizens to how long the Democrats have been using them for their own Democrat agenda. The KKK was Democrat, _not_ Republican, Democrats, not Republicans, were the party of slavery, and the Democrats fought tooth and nail to prevent the Civil Rights Act from passing. But now they act as if they are the only ones who can save black people from oppression. Anyone - black or white - who believes that lie deserves the abuse they get from the Democrats. Ask yourselves, folks - how much did Obama do to increase black employment, to free blacks from excessive prison sentences, or anything else that really helped black people in America, during his TWO terms in office? Look at Mad Maxine's district - the pot-holed streets, the trash, the crime - and then look at the district where _she_ lives, which is NOT the district she represents. 

BLM is operated by Marxists. They say it right on their web site. They don't care about blacks, they are using them - along with ignorant, virtue-signaling whites  - to crash America, which will damage blacks as much or more than whites, Hispanics, or Asians."

WJ refused to post this comment. They said it violated their "community standards". So WJ is getting as bad as Wordpress. Are they related? Is WJ published using Wordpress? I didn't see any indication or explanation of that.

Well, they _did_ accept my next two comments:

"WJ - your community guidelines suck. FO and get real, will you?"

"WJ doesn't care for the truth any more than Twitter, Farcebook, or any other organ of the Left. Their modserators/monitors or algorithms refuse to accept any criticism of BLM - an openly Marxist group that does NOT believe that black lives matter, only Marxism and the destruction of America. They have openly stated they intend to "burn down the system". How about it, WJ? Does that sound like it will help our black citizens? Will that help make life better for them? Get a life, would you please?"

It's becoming rather frightening how so many entities on the Internet are afraid to allow any criticism whatsoever of BLM. Are they afraid they will get their offices trashed? Then they should nut-up and pay some staff to stand guard with a couple of ARs or AKs and stop ther violence before it happens. BLM, Antifa and the rest of the scum will run home to Mommy if they get the idea that someone might _shoot_ them before allowing them to vandalize, burn and destroy their business, their livelihood. They are quite used to getting away with it right now, but I just read that a town - Summerlin - in Nevada near Las Vegas posted armed citizens in the neighborhood (who were encouraged by their local cops), and the little scummers ran their tiny tallywhackers back home, without throwing a single brick (a number of which had been brought in to assist in their intent to damage the town).

If more people, more businesses, don't grow some wevos and stand against the violence, it will get much worse, and it will not end well.

Black Lying Marxists

I posted this on Farcebook today. It was actually meant for here rather than FB, but because I have been neglecting STL for so long, I wrote it there first. The few friends and family who bother to read my disjointed sputterings don't visit here. Hopefully, a few "old timers" who still have a link here will read this and get something out of it.

BLM: Black Lying Marxists. They have no interest in helping blacks, only in tearing down our country, our communities, our culture. "Systemic racism" is merely one of the lies they tell to push gutless Democrat politicians/mayors/city council members into allowing them to destroy cities, tear down American history, ignore the true issues blacks are dealing with (like black-on-black crime), and "burn down" our society.

They are a vile, vocal, violent minority subsidized by people who want America destroyed - like Soros and the organizations he has created and financed (e.g. the "Open Society Foundation"). Soros believes only America stands between him and his goal of global government, an oligarchy which will take away the God-given/natural rights that every _individual_ possesses.

You have only to look at Cuba and Venezuela in order to see what will happen to America if we allow the Democrats to push the Marxist agenda of BLM and other groups which are trying to divide Americans and destroy our country. These small groups would be unable to succeed if Democrat politicians such as Pelosi did not assist them in their destruction. Pelosi and the Democrat politicians who assist her in these endeavors are truly traitors, aiding and abetting the enemies of America.

There is a young lady who left Venezuela to come to America, and she stated that the end of liberty _begins_ with tearing down the statues. With demonizing our history - which is happening every day that our K-12 schools are open - and indoctrinating our children. They have been teaching for some time now that "old white men", who killed the "First People" ("Native Americans", although they didn't originate here in America, either), were evil, and responsible for every death, every crime against reds, blacks, yellows, and even other whites, never mentioning that they simply killed each other until we arrived. That the white Europeans (who created all of the wealth of the culture and knowledge of Western Civilization) were evil, oppressive devils who abused and debased everyone else. Those "teachers, using Common Core and other nonsense curricula in their goal of reducing the knowledge while increasing the ignorance of children, have been teaching students all across the country to hate themselves for being white, or to hate whites because they _aren't_.

They have been teaching far too many lies to list. Another popular one is that the muslims created our system of mathematics. This has been told for so long and so often, that many people believe it. India created our system of mathematics, and the muslims simply lied and laid claim to it, to enhance the reputation of their crude, perverted, and violent actual culture. Their claims (repeated without any basis in fact by NASA and other muslim apologists, thanks to Obama's love for his brothers in islam, a love far superior to his disdain for  the American citizens who elected him, and for whom he swore an oath to protect and defend - along with the Constitution. Of course, he had his fingers crossed behind his back when he stood there in front of millions of us (those who watch TV, anyway), pretending to mean everything he said.

The Marxists were, and are, very clever, even though they are ignorant of much of the truth. They understood, more than a hundred years ago, even before the progressive Woodrow Wilson and FDR -   who was an extreme socialist himself, far preferring the company of Josef Stalin to that of Winston Churchill (much as Obama also preferred) - that taking over and changing the nature of education was the best way of perverting the culture of America. They started by subverting the teachers' colleges, pushing deeper and deeper into socialist thought, into believing in the collective, rather than in the individual and individual rights. The moved away from phonetics - a method of teaching reading that did not require the memorization of individual words to actually . They continued to develop teaching methods that made learning difficult, thinking for themselves almost impossible. 

The Left wants people to be docile, ignorant, and unable to solve their own problems, dependent upon the state for either employment or welfare, but not developed into a strong middle class. Permitting the establishment of a strong, knowledgable, independent middle class is too risky. People capable of using logic and reasoning to make their way through life would be a threat to an oligarchy, to a government run by those who consider themselves elite, smarter than the "common man", better able to decide what is "best" for the peons. Those people currently exist - many of the bureaucrats in the State Department are of that mind. Many are related to each other by blood or marriage, have attended the same Ivy League universities, joined the Council on Foreign Relations as did their fathers, brothers, friends of the family. The Deep State™ is populated by those believing themselves superior to the rest of us. Think of the arrogance of Comey, Strzok, Brennan, and so many others in various bureaucracies and three-letter agencies. Think of the Obamas, the Bushes, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Nadler, McConnell, Boehner, Ryan, and so many others.

Well, enough. I've probably bored you to death, if you've even read this far. If you are not already familiar with how long-winded I am, you are now. I apologize, but I was raised before the advent of the "sound-bite", the catch-phrase, the "tweet". If you get something from my meanderings, my often scattered thoughts, feel free to take it just a paragraph or two at a sitting, like you might with a novel or textbook. If there isn't enough substance, or my conservative views are too much, too far out to enable you to agree with anything I write, that is fine. Thanks for visiting, and I appreciate your willingness to come this far. If any of this rings a bell for you, or causes you to re-think your assumptions, reach different conclusions than you had before, you are more than welcome to return and visit at your leisure. I am no pundit, no Victor Davis Hanson (barely on the same _planet_ with him), but I think some of my conservative beliefs can bear repeating. If they caused you to think about some of these issues, I can ask for no more.

A new lease on STL? Let's try.

It has been many moons since I last posted here. Although I was able to write something, some times it would not post. Also, I was unable to comment on my own post - even in response to someone else's comment, which certainly should be allowed.

So, here we sit, on the day of our Lord Saturday, June 20, 2020. No, I am not actually religious, although I was confirmed as a Catholic back when I was ten or eleven. Lost the faith when I was fourteen, and haven't looked back. I fully support Christianity, and try to live by the Judeo-Christian moral code, but I am no longer Christian myself.

The U.S. of A. is going crazy. Because Marxist groups like Black Lies, I mean Black Lives Matter rioted across the country, with the blessing of many Democrat mayors, city councils, and Democrat governors, looting, burning buildings, cop cars, the cars of homeless people (blacks also) who lived in them, looting and destroying black businesses, and killing cops - including black cops - and a number of whites civilians as well, it is now unacceptable to speak badly of Black Lies Matter. You can lose your job, be physically attacked, receive death threats, and be treated like a criminal by whites (progressives/liberals) and blacks.

Do I sound like I give a damn about who likes my First Amendment-protected right to free speech? No, I don't. I've been blocked numerous times on Farcebook, by Mother Zucker's drones, because "community standards". Well, guess what FB? BFYTW. Your censoring of truth, simply because it conflicts with your Marxist agenda is simply a sign of your desperation. Conservatives find work-arounds, and the signal cannot be stopped.

Black Lies Matter doesn't give an airborne rodent's backside about black people. Their "leader" (self-proclaimed?) in "Chaz" or "Chad", or whatever ludicrous name they currently give the blocks of Seattle that the Governor and mayor are enthused about providing for them in order to try their hand at anarchy (at least one shooting death so far - probably gang-banger vs gang-banger), openly stated herself that she is a Marxist, and that "it isn't violence to fight violence". She added that she is willing to use any means whatsoever to effect her goals, including removing the police. Undoubtedly, she has some brown- or black-shirts waiting in the wings to be the "organ of the state" as soon as the mayor and/or governor completely shut down the Seattle PD.

If Black Lies Matter was actually concerned, actually cared about blacks, they would try to do something about the thousands of black-on-black murders in Democrat-controlled cities and states, instead of loosing the dogs of war when one of the unarmed blacks - a number usually one _half_ of the number of unarmed whites killed by cops - gets killed by, or is allowed to die by, a white police officer. But they don't really care.

People need to force businesses, corporations, city councils, and local and state courts to stop punishing those brave enough to speak out against the violence done by BLM and also by Antifa (a fascist group pretending to be anti-fascist, much like BLM pretends to care about blacks. First, because it _needs_ to be said, and second, because we have a natural/God-given right to free speech.

More to follow later, but I'll cut this short to see if blogspot will allow my blog to function as it did when I first started writing here. Take care, folks, and VOTE in 2020 - NOT by mail-in vote, unless you are physically unable to do it in person.

Edit: I tried twice, and am still unable to comment on my own blog, even though I was able to do so at a time in the past.