As I have stated numerous times in the past, the abuse, the sodomizing rapes of young boys, is a major facet of islam. mohammed intentionally included various forms of sexual deviation in his death cult "religion" in order to justify his own disgusting urges, but also to attract as many followers as possible. As has been the case for as long as islam has existed, "Women are for children, boys are for pleasure."
Our men in uniform are being forced to look the other way while our muslim "allies" in Afghanistan and elsewhere bring dogs onto U.S. bases to torture and otherwise abuse. They torture and kill the dogs for sport, and since islam tells them that dogs are "unclean", they feel justified in doing so. But, far worse, they are forced to look the other way and not intervene when they hear the screams of young boys being raped - on U.S. military bases - by the very "allies" they are working with to "win the hearts and minds" of the locals.
Even when the people of the villages where these boys are kidnapped from (and then held, chained to the muslim "allies'" beds on those U.S. bases they share with our troops), beg the U.S. military to save, to rescue, those children, the commanding officers force our men to ignore it, refuse to allow them to intervene. When one or more of them do intervene, they are court-marshaled, forced to resign (if they are officers), or otherwise harassed.
I'll say it again, for the cheap seats: there are no socially redeeming features of islam. It is a vicious, disgusting, morally depraved death cult that panders to the basest urges of the worst sub-human creatures to walk the face of this earth.
Read the whole article - and the comments - here: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/09/u-s-soldiers-ordered-to-ignore-afghan-allies-abuse-of-boys
By the way, bacha bazi - "boy play" with bacha bereesh - "beardless boys" - is supposedly not permitted under shariah, but that is a lie. It is acceptable because it was acceptable to mohammed, the "prophet" (p*ss be onto him), who was/is considered "perfect, without fault". Anything mohammed did is consequently deemed correct and acceptable behavior.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Sorry, folks. I was completely ignorant about comment rules. Anyone can post, but I'd prefer a name, even if it is made up. Anonymous posts just seem cheap, if you know what I mean. Also, if you want to argue a point, that's fine. Cheap shots and name calling towards me or another person commenting (ad hominem) is rude and will get you banned. Other than that, I'd love to get some comments.