Who will be Biden's V.P., and how was she chosen?

My friend Bill Doyle and I have believed for some time that Hillary will be "chosen" by Biden as his VP. I've been giving it a lot of thought, and I'm having second (and third) thoughts.  I think it might be Michelle Obama, instead. First, she is not under a cloud of multiple felony crimes as Hillary is. No, Hillary will never be charged, let alone tried, for even the felonies she has _admitted_ being guilty of committing. But many people may still understand she is a criminal - just an "undocumented" criminal.

Another reason is that - in my opinion only - her sociopathic personality and extreme anger when things don't go her way would make her less controllable by those who operate (like a marionette) the various Democrat leaders, such as Barack Hussein. Given the power of the presidency, even those in control might fear finding their names on her "List". I'm not sure she _could_ be controlled, and the PTB may feel the same way.

It could be claimed by the DNC that Michelle is far more popular, that she would win the bipartisan black vote, the bipartisan "female" vote, the total Democrat vote, and even the vote of  non-Democrat white male virtue-signalers. So, if all the Democrat election fraud by mail-in vote, hacked voting machines, vote harvesting, illegal alien votes, multiple voting by Democrat voters, and other methods were in actuality overcome by the real votes of the majority of legal American voters choosing Trump, they could still manipulate the vote _count_ itself, and claim she won due to her "widespread bipartisan popularity". That would be a far easier sell than it would be for Hillary. (DNC ad for Biden VP: "No hags need apply").

Think about this, and point out where I am wrong. Please. I think Hillary might still be easier to beat, so seeing Michelle made VP by the DNC could be a very bad thing.

How the DNC disenfranchised Democrat voters

Has anyone come to the same conclusion that I have on the whole Democrat candidate for President farce? On why they have been running a demonstrably mentally "disadvantaged" candidate for President? How they can even imagine that running him would be good for the country (which they obviously DON'T care about)? The DNC may have been throwing nominees at the wall by the bushel, looking to see who might stick, but - as we saw in 2016 and again now - the DNC is who actually chooses the candidate, NOT the voters.

Don't get me wrong, the Republicans do it, too. Ron Paul was very popular when running against Obama, too popular for the establishment Republicans, the RNC and influencers hired by them (and the bankers, especially with his determination to "audit the Federal Reserve"). So the Republicans refused to count most of his votes, and he eventually dropped out, in spite of receiving far more donations, far more money than McCain. He either figured out, and/or was actually told, that he would "never be the man".

We saw it happen again this year, with Bernie. Oh, they let him run with the rest of the Democrat Rat Pack, but it was a forgone conclusion that he would be bought off (was given a very nice house last time) once again. Still a downer for him, but I'm sure it was explained very well that he would step down, and why.

So, this time they are bypassing the Democrat voters altogether. Yes, all of the primaries were a farce, a sham, as the DNC knew it would be running a man suffering from dementia. That way _they_ can pick who they truly want in office by picking the VP. If their voter fraud mojo is strong enough (they will go all-out this time, not making the mistake they made with Hillary, thinking they had it in the bag), they will inaugurate him, and then sadly use the 25th Amendment to remove him from office (Hillary would probably have just "tagged" him), making _their_ choice for President the new President.

Pick this apart if you can, but it makes sense to me that this is what we are seeing here, in slow motion.

The Western Journal Kneels for BLM

I just attempted to comment on a Western Journal article written by Michael Austin, a bright and articulate young man. He wrote about an entire "pro" sports team (I guess fast-pitch softball is a pro sport these days) of young women (can't say ladies) who called it "reverse racism" when their manager made a positive comment about President Trump. My comment was:

"Good article, Mr. Austin. These fools getting butt-hurt because they believe the lies spread by Kaepernick, BLM, Antifa, and the scum Democrats in Congress led by Pelosi, simply prove how low their IQ is, how ignorant they are, and how easily they are manipulated and used by the Left/Democrats. Fortunately, more and more blacks such as Candace Owens and numerous other black conservatives are awakening black citizens to how long the Democrats have been using them for their own Democrat agenda. The KKK was Democrat, _not_ Republican, Democrats, not Republicans, were the party of slavery, and the Democrats fought tooth and nail to prevent the Civil Rights Act from passing. But now they act as if they are the only ones who can save black people from oppression. Anyone - black or white - who believes that lie deserves the abuse they get from the Democrats. Ask yourselves, folks - how much did Obama do to increase black employment, to free blacks from excessive prison sentences, or anything else that really helped black people in America, during his TWO terms in office? Look at Mad Maxine's district - the pot-holed streets, the trash, the crime - and then look at the district where _she_ lives, which is NOT the district she represents. 

BLM is operated by Marxists. They say it right on their web site. They don't care about blacks, they are using them - along with ignorant, virtue-signaling whites  - to crash America, which will damage blacks as much or more than whites, Hispanics, or Asians."

WJ refused to post this comment. They said it violated their "community standards". So WJ is getting as bad as Wordpress. Are they related? Is WJ published using Wordpress? I didn't see any indication or explanation of that.

Well, they _did_ accept my next two comments:

"WJ - your community guidelines suck. FO and get real, will you?"

"WJ doesn't care for the truth any more than Twitter, Farcebook, or any other organ of the Left. Their modserators/monitors or algorithms refuse to accept any criticism of BLM - an openly Marxist group that does NOT believe that black lives matter, only Marxism and the destruction of America. They have openly stated they intend to "burn down the system". How about it, WJ? Does that sound like it will help our black citizens? Will that help make life better for them? Get a life, would you please?"

It's becoming rather frightening how so many entities on the Internet are afraid to allow any criticism whatsoever of BLM. Are they afraid they will get their offices trashed? Then they should nut-up and pay some staff to stand guard with a couple of ARs or AKs and stop ther violence before it happens. BLM, Antifa and the rest of the scum will run home to Mommy if they get the idea that someone might _shoot_ them before allowing them to vandalize, burn and destroy their business, their livelihood. They are quite used to getting away with it right now, but I just read that a town - Summerlin - in Nevada near Las Vegas posted armed citizens in the neighborhood (who were encouraged by their local cops), and the little scummers ran their tiny tallywhackers back home, without throwing a single brick (a number of which had been brought in to assist in their intent to damage the town).

If more people, more businesses, don't grow some wevos and stand against the violence, it will get much worse, and it will not end well.

Black Lying Marxists

I posted this on Farcebook today. It was actually meant for here rather than FB, but because I have been neglecting STL for so long, I wrote it there first. The few friends and family who bother to read my disjointed sputterings don't visit here. Hopefully, a few "old timers" who still have a link here will read this and get something out of it.

BLM: Black Lying Marxists. They have no interest in helping blacks, only in tearing down our country, our communities, our culture. "Systemic racism" is merely one of the lies they tell to push gutless Democrat politicians/mayors/city council members into allowing them to destroy cities, tear down American history, ignore the true issues blacks are dealing with (like black-on-black crime), and "burn down" our society.

They are a vile, vocal, violent minority subsidized by people who want America destroyed - like Soros and the organizations he has created and financed (e.g. the "Open Society Foundation"). Soros believes only America stands between him and his goal of global government, an oligarchy which will take away the God-given/natural rights that every _individual_ possesses.

You have only to look at Cuba and Venezuela in order to see what will happen to America if we allow the Democrats to push the Marxist agenda of BLM and other groups which are trying to divide Americans and destroy our country. These small groups would be unable to succeed if Democrat politicians such as Pelosi did not assist them in their destruction. Pelosi and the Democrat politicians who assist her in these endeavors are truly traitors, aiding and abetting the enemies of America.

There is a young lady who left Venezuela to come to America, and she stated that the end of liberty _begins_ with tearing down the statues. With demonizing our history - which is happening every day that our K-12 schools are open - and indoctrinating our children. They have been teaching for some time now that "old white men", who killed the "First People" ("Native Americans", although they didn't originate here in America, either), were evil, and responsible for every death, every crime against reds, blacks, yellows, and even other whites, never mentioning that they simply killed each other until we arrived. That the white Europeans (who created all of the wealth of the culture and knowledge of Western Civilization) were evil, oppressive devils who abused and debased everyone else. Those "teachers, using Common Core and other nonsense curricula in their goal of reducing the knowledge while increasing the ignorance of children, have been teaching students all across the country to hate themselves for being white, or to hate whites because they _aren't_.

They have been teaching far too many lies to list. Another popular one is that the muslims created our system of mathematics. This has been told for so long and so often, that many people believe it. India created our system of mathematics, and the muslims simply lied and laid claim to it, to enhance the reputation of their crude, perverted, and violent actual culture. Their claims (repeated without any basis in fact by NASA and other muslim apologists, thanks to Obama's love for his brothers in islam, a love far superior to his disdain for  the American citizens who elected him, and for whom he swore an oath to protect and defend - along with the Constitution. Of course, he had his fingers crossed behind his back when he stood there in front of millions of us (those who watch TV, anyway), pretending to mean everything he said.

The Marxists were, and are, very clever, even though they are ignorant of much of the truth. They understood, more than a hundred years ago, even before the progressive Woodrow Wilson and FDR -   who was an extreme socialist himself, far preferring the company of Josef Stalin to that of Winston Churchill (much as Obama also preferred) - that taking over and changing the nature of education was the best way of perverting the culture of America. They started by subverting the teachers' colleges, pushing deeper and deeper into socialist thought, into believing in the collective, rather than in the individual and individual rights. The moved away from phonetics - a method of teaching reading that did not require the memorization of individual words to actually . They continued to develop teaching methods that made learning difficult, thinking for themselves almost impossible. 

The Left wants people to be docile, ignorant, and unable to solve their own problems, dependent upon the state for either employment or welfare, but not developed into a strong middle class. Permitting the establishment of a strong, knowledgable, independent middle class is too risky. People capable of using logic and reasoning to make their way through life would be a threat to an oligarchy, to a government run by those who consider themselves elite, smarter than the "common man", better able to decide what is "best" for the peons. Those people currently exist - many of the bureaucrats in the State Department are of that mind. Many are related to each other by blood or marriage, have attended the same Ivy League universities, joined the Council on Foreign Relations as did their fathers, brothers, friends of the family. The Deep State™ is populated by those believing themselves superior to the rest of us. Think of the arrogance of Comey, Strzok, Brennan, and so many others in various bureaucracies and three-letter agencies. Think of the Obamas, the Bushes, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Nadler, McConnell, Boehner, Ryan, and so many others.

Well, enough. I've probably bored you to death, if you've even read this far. If you are not already familiar with how long-winded I am, you are now. I apologize, but I was raised before the advent of the "sound-bite", the catch-phrase, the "tweet". If you get something from my meanderings, my often scattered thoughts, feel free to take it just a paragraph or two at a sitting, like you might with a novel or textbook. If there isn't enough substance, or my conservative views are too much, too far out to enable you to agree with anything I write, that is fine. Thanks for visiting, and I appreciate your willingness to come this far. If any of this rings a bell for you, or causes you to re-think your assumptions, reach different conclusions than you had before, you are more than welcome to return and visit at your leisure. I am no pundit, no Victor Davis Hanson (barely on the same _planet_ with him), but I think some of my conservative beliefs can bear repeating. If they caused you to think about some of these issues, I can ask for no more.

A new lease on STL? Let's try.

It has been many moons since I last posted here. Although I was able to write something, some times it would not post. Also, I was unable to comment on my own post - even in response to someone else's comment, which certainly should be allowed.

So, here we sit, on the day of our Lord Saturday, June 20, 2020. No, I am not actually religious, although I was confirmed as a Catholic back when I was ten or eleven. Lost the faith when I was fourteen, and haven't looked back. I fully support Christianity, and try to live by the Judeo-Christian moral code, but I am no longer Christian myself.

The U.S. of A. is going crazy. Because Marxist groups like Black Lies, I mean Black Lives Matter rioted across the country, with the blessing of many Democrat mayors, city councils, and Democrat governors, looting, burning buildings, cop cars, the cars of homeless people (blacks also) who lived in them, looting and destroying black businesses, and killing cops - including black cops - and a number of whites civilians as well, it is now unacceptable to speak badly of Black Lies Matter. You can lose your job, be physically attacked, receive death threats, and be treated like a criminal by whites (progressives/liberals) and blacks.

Do I sound like I give a damn about who likes my First Amendment-protected right to free speech? No, I don't. I've been blocked numerous times on Farcebook, by Mother Zucker's drones, because "community standards". Well, guess what FB? BFYTW. Your censoring of truth, simply because it conflicts with your Marxist agenda is simply a sign of your desperation. Conservatives find work-arounds, and the signal cannot be stopped.

Black Lies Matter doesn't give an airborne rodent's backside about black people. Their "leader" (self-proclaimed?) in "Chaz" or "Chad", or whatever ludicrous name they currently give the blocks of Seattle that the Governor and mayor are enthused about providing for them in order to try their hand at anarchy (at least one shooting death so far - probably gang-banger vs gang-banger), openly stated herself that she is a Marxist, and that "it isn't violence to fight violence". She added that she is willing to use any means whatsoever to effect her goals, including removing the police. Undoubtedly, she has some brown- or black-shirts waiting in the wings to be the "organ of the state" as soon as the mayor and/or governor completely shut down the Seattle PD.

If Black Lies Matter was actually concerned, actually cared about blacks, they would try to do something about the thousands of black-on-black murders in Democrat-controlled cities and states, instead of loosing the dogs of war when one of the unarmed blacks - a number usually one _half_ of the number of unarmed whites killed by cops - gets killed by, or is allowed to die by, a white police officer. But they don't really care.

People need to force businesses, corporations, city councils, and local and state courts to stop punishing those brave enough to speak out against the violence done by BLM and also by Antifa (a fascist group pretending to be anti-fascist, much like BLM pretends to care about blacks. First, because it _needs_ to be said, and second, because we have a natural/God-given right to free speech.

More to follow later, but I'll cut this short to see if blogspot will allow my blog to function as it did when I first started writing here. Take care, folks, and VOTE in 2020 - NOT by mail-in vote, unless you are physically unable to do it in person.

Edit: I tried twice, and am still unable to comment on my own blog, even though I was able to do so at a time in the past.

      

We do as we must

Grog,

For some reason I am unable to publish any comments on my own blog, so I'll respond to yours here, as a post. Maybe this will work.

I've stopped visiting Pete's blog. I like him, but I've tired of how the comments seem to have been taken over by anti-Semites and ad hominem a**holes. A waste of my time wading through their dementia.

So I missed that about LaVoy. Put a black robe on someone, let them decide the ordering of the lives of others, and you have a recipe for not simply arrogance, but for a god-complex. Hopefully, it will be a case of "as ye sow".

If Hillary could be convinced he was preparing to examine evidence of misprision in the case of the Haiti earthquake debacle, she might add his name to those of the Haitian official, Klaus Eberwein, who supposedly shot himself in the head the day before he was to testify before Congress, and the surgeon, Dr. Dean Lorich, who supposedly comitted suicide by stabbing himself in the chest with a knife. Both happening just a few days ago. I would welcome the karmic balance, although finding him"suicided" with a literal fork sticking out of his right temple might be a bit harder for her to pull off. However, since there is nothing in it for her, I shouldn't fantasize about it.

I've donated to LaVoy's family, and bought his book, Only By Blood And Suffering, and Thara Tenney's book, Liberty Rising.

On the issue of the "impeachment" by the House, I think it is meant to prepare for a coup sometime next year. I am thinking the Dems will attempt to pull off some sort of "Trump cannot be on the ballot", "not a legitimate candidate" caper - projecting their own transgressions onto him,  just before everyone is set to head to the polls. They have proven that the rule of law, from the Constitution itself to the legal procedures involved in impeaching a president means nothing to them. The secret meetings, refusal to allow other sitting legislators into the room, only permitting parts of witness testimony to be seen, badgering witnesses, not allowing Trump's lawyers or representatives to be present and to cross examine, all point to a willingness to completely ignore the law.

When I was working for the California Highway Patrol, I was forced to join the union (C.A.U.S.E.). One of the bylaws of the union was that in any vote upon an issue, however the union board voted was the way the issue would be handled. Period. Even if the membership voted unanimously for or against, the vote of the board determined the outcome. Insane? Yes. I have no idea how they were able to get away with it, but they did.

I think the Dems believe they have the same "right" to overrule the wishes of the citizens of this country - for our own benefit, of course. Some of them may even actually believe it. They have been trying it by voter fraud, having been successful often enough that they have come to think that they simply cannot be denied. They understand they were able to pull of the most outrageous fraud in the history of the United States, by electing, twice, an ineligible, America-hating bag of pus, who did his best to destroy our country as well as Israel - by giving Iran secret information on Israel's nuclear assets and capabilities, and also by helping to finance Iran's nuclear ambitions, giving them billions of dollars ($1.7B in cash, actual currency, if not more that we did not hear about) assisting them in making them a new nuclear power. I wouldn't be surprised if it was discovered that he even released technical information on _our_ nuclear technology, as well as tactics and capabilities.

I read about Pelosi's son, and her appearance in a company advertising video, and I read that some other politicos have been involved in the Ukraine's businesses. I'd like to think that would make a difference, but obviously it won't. I believe I can state that as fact because we all have seen video of Biden saying out loud that he extorted the firing of that prosecutor by threatening to withhold a billion dollars worth of loan guarantees if they did not. He should have been taken into custody, tried, and convicted for that.

Additionally, based on numerous videos, photos, and the statements of various Secret Service agents, he is a sexual predator, a groper and a pedophile who cannot keep his hands off of children. Jeff Sessions slapped his hands away when he tried to touch Sessions' granddaughter.

Yes, I know Biden won't get elected, but he shouldn't even be allowed to run for office. Any office, let alone elected as the Groper-in-Chief. A gay, pinto Communist was bad enough, but a pedophile? He shouldn't still be drawing breath.

So, I am really pessimistic about anyone being held to the rule of law. The Left has decided that the Right is too weak, disorganized and easy to browbeat. Trump is strong, and he has pulled off some fine moves, shown some real finesse, so I am hoping that he can handle all that they throw at him. If he can't, it may come down to a real civil war right on the steps of the Capitol building, or of the Supreme Court. As disorganized as we are on the Right, I can't see us sitting at home, watching the Left remove him forcibly from office. If we allow them to pull off such a coup, I doubt there will ever be another lawful federal election in America.

Has the the Left manufactured a crisis? Will Trump be defeated by it?

In responding to a loyal Internet friend who stops by here to check for my sporadic submissions, I find myself motivated to skate around the fringe of "conspiracy theory". Allow me to state right up front that there are indeed many such that are made up of whole cloth, that belong on the pages of the supermarket publications that try to catch your eye in the check-out line, yet some do hold a fragment of the truth.

Consider this for a moment: what if these "newspapers" and magazines are being paid to present a theory that is true in order to cause most of us to immediately disregard it? Think of a"dossier" whose creation was made possible by a fervent desire to unseat a sitting President, a cabal of Deep State actors who hold that desire, a very large sum of money provided by a sworn enemy of America who has been financing a tremendous assault upon our southern national border, and the subversion of due process and our system of justice, our rule of law by the aforementioned.

Does it seem a bit strange that we are seeing a larger number of mass shootings in such a short time-frame, when these things normally happen in random spurts of insanity, in local events, and in fewer numbers? Have we not also seen some of these shootings, such as the Tucson shooting where Giffords was wounded, was targeted by a left-leaning mental case?

I believe there are too many mass shootings occurring in such a short time span for them to have happened without assistance from the Left. I believe they have been engineered and set into motion to force President Trump into a corner, forcing him to seriously consider not simply a condemnation of the shootings, but to "do something" - to push for further gun control, right at the start of his campaign for re-election.

Permit me to posit a number of interesting facts along with some suppositions:

The Left, as represented by various Democrat presidential contenders, Deep State actors, loud and illogical Congressional freshwomen (not being politically correct here, simply aiming for a particular group), and various other political rabblerousers in the media and at large, have all made it very plain they want our legally and properly elected President removed from office. This is an unassailable fact, which even the Left itself would support.

The President, due to these mass shooting incidents, is being advised by his people and those on the Left to "do something" - a catch phrase used by politicians which usually is equivalent to the desire to be seen as responding, but via the restriction of someone's unalienable rights.

I've been around for almost seven decades, and thanks to such events as the Vietnam War, the social upheaval of the "Sixties", and the later evolution of the Web through "bulletin boards" and now not only the Internet in general, but through "social media", I have been politically conscious for a good portion of the time involved in those changes. It was a long and relatively slow process, during which my social evolution exhibited a change mentioned (via attribution, at least) by Sir Winston Churchill:

"If you are in your twenties, and are not a liberal, you have no heart. If you are in your fifties and are not a conservative, you have no brain."

This evolution of consciousness was aided by the fact that the Fabians (precursors to today's Left, whose agenda included taking over teacher's colleges and training generations of teachers to think and teach in the dialectic of the Left) had not yet completely taken over our system of education at the time I attended high school in New York. This was, believe it or not, a school which did its best to teach its pupils to think. To learn and use logic. To reason out the truth through the use of critical thinking, which was taught as an actual course, offered and taken by many of us in our senior year. 

So, here we have a number of incidents, occurring so close together as to be happening at approximately the same time, politically, at least. Happening as the Left was running an incredible number of Democrat candidates for the Presidency through their paces, almost as a "shotgun effect". Instead of actually targeting the process and their platform with one or two individuals who represented the Left's that platform, they have thrown a large number of candidates - all socialists, if not outright communists, like Bernie Sanders - against the wall to see who might stick.

All of those candidates are anti-Second Amendment. Several of them openly stated they wanted to dismantle the Second Amendment, remove its protection of the right to keep and bear arms, stating that they would confiscate some or all of the weapons owned by many millions of Americans, weapons that Americans have a right to own and carry. A right that should be unassailable, but which has actually been attacked for much of the history of government in America.

Another fact: many millions of Americans, especially those who cherish the protection provided by the Second Amendment, consider that right a go-no go gauge of a candidate for the office of the Presidency. George H.W. Bush is considered to have lost his bid for a second term in office because he willingly assisted in the addition of more gun control legislation during his first term, in spite of having campaigned as a supporter of the Second Amendment. Many of us Americans refused to vote for him because of this.

The Left is certainly quite aware of this fact. So, I repeat my premise: I believe there are too many mass shootings occurring in such a short time span for them to have happened without assistance from the Left. I believe they have been engineered and set into motion to force President Trump into a corner, forcing him to seriously consider not simply a condemnation of the shootings, but to "do something" - to push for further gun control, right at the start of his campaign for re-election.

I have read a number of comments, in a variety of venues, wherein staunch conservatives have stated they will not vote for Trump if he helps create and pass further gun control. The passage of a new regulation by BATF banning "bump-fire" stocks, which was supported by Trump, was considered a "warning shot". Further gun control - especially "Red Flag" legislation, which removes due process from any citizen accused by almost anyone, without fact or warrant, which gives law enforcement the power to confiscate all of his firearms - would be deemed by conservatives as proof that Trump cannot be trusted, that he has failed to support his own word that he would defend the Second Amendment. 

The loss of those millions of votes, especially when compounded by the repeat of the voter fraud perpetrated by the Left in the last (and prior) elections may very well spell the end of America. If Trump loses, a socialist will be elected. A socialist who has already admitted they will seek confiscation of our firearms. A socialist who will work to insure that our government becomes a tool of the Left, run by the Democrats as their puppets. If the Democrats are able to take over the government, this will indeed be the last election ever held in America. This country, which was given the opportunity to create a place on Earth where freedom and justice could live and grow, will have died. "Democratic" Socialism - aka tyranny - will rule from then on.