400+ Little girls poisoned. Hypocrisy, plain and simple.

Another incidence of muslims bastards poisoning little girls who are sent to school to improve their minds and their lot in life. How sick is that? How vile the perverted muslim bastards who would do such a thing to innocent children, most of whom didn't even have a choice about it in the first place.

We all know - or should know - that the Left is populated by hypocrites. None are more hypocritical than the feminists, such as the fools at NOW. They pretend to support and defend the rights of women, support changes in our culture that will stop the violence of rape and domestic abuse, the general mistreatment of women.

Why is it then we have never heard them speak out against Islam? How is it we have never heard their voices raised about the genital mutilation of female children and young girls? About the honor killings that occur routinely in the Middle East, Europe, and even here in America?

Why is it we read articles by female "pundits" and "journalists" who claim that only Islamophobes speak out against Islam, like this twit, Wendy Kaminer? Women who ignore the Qur'an where it permits full sexual penetration of nine-year-old girls, and"thighing" of female infants?

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:

"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."

Notice that there is no real penalty for a muslim (may he forever rot in Hell) penetrating an infant - the vile rape of an innocent infant girl who is torn and damaged because her vagina is far too small for an adult penis - other than "being responsible for her subsistence". Which means he can basically starve her, use her as a sex slave, beat and otherwise abuse her for the rest of her life, as long as she gets enough food and water to "subsist". He still gets to have four wives - all of whom will further abuse and beat the girl who is barely subsisting on whatever scraps she is allowed. Yes, this happens with great frequency in the backward nations where Islam holds sway. Including with our "good buddies" in Saudi Arabia.

Don't these women on the Left truly care about other women, about little girls, about female infants? Of course not. If they did, they would speak out, they would shout it from the rooftops and from the front pages of all of their Leftist rags, like the New York Times. The reality is that it is simply about power. Not empowering women, but empowering those who pretend to speak for them, who pretend to wish to raise them up into better circumstances, equal pay for equal work, etc., but actually don't care about anything beyond their own enhancement and enrichment.

That actually defines the Left. They pretend care about the poor, the downtrodden, the disadvantaged, when they only wish to use them to advance their agenda of turning America into a socialist State, with their leaders becoming the leaders of us all. Silence while children are poisoned, sexually abused, genitally mutilated, and even killed. Hypocrisy, plain and simple.